2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An expanded ultraluminous X-ray source catalogue

Abstract: Context. Ultraluminous X-ray sources (L X ×10 39 erg s −1 , ULXs) are excellent probes for extreme accretion physics, star formation history in galaxies, and intermediate-mass black holes searches. As the sample size of X-ray data from modern observatories such as XMM-Newton and Chandra increases, producing extensive catalogues of ULXs and studying their collective properties has become both a possibility and a priority. Aims. Our aim is to build a clean updated ULX catalogue based on one of the most recent XM… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a Galactic contaminant highlights a weakness in the filtering of W22 for such objects. However, this could readily be corrected by the use of Gaia data and/or the use of statistical/multiwavelength identification techniques to better identify foreground objects in future catalogues, as has already been done in the work of Bernadich et al (2022) andTranin et al (2023). 4XMM J091948.8-121429 on the other hand remains an excellent eULX candidate, but suffers from minimal archival data being available at present, so also requires further observational study to improve our understanding of it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of a Galactic contaminant highlights a weakness in the filtering of W22 for such objects. However, this could readily be corrected by the use of Gaia data and/or the use of statistical/multiwavelength identification techniques to better identify foreground objects in future catalogues, as has already been done in the work of Bernadich et al (2022) andTranin et al (2023). 4XMM J091948.8-121429 on the other hand remains an excellent eULX candidate, but suffers from minimal archival data being available at present, so also requires further observational study to improve our understanding of it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example shows that more filtering is required to pick up Galactic objects, for example looking for counterparts with measured parallax at low Galactic latitudes. The 4XMM-DR9 ULX catalogue of Bernadich et al (2022) performs better than W22 in this regard by searching catalogues including Gaia DR2 for optical point source counterparts to its ULX candidates, and then using the X-ray/optical flux ratios to exclude stars and other objects. The even more recent catalogue of Tranin et al (2023) uses an automated probabilistic classification of X-ray sources to produce a catalogue with a claimed contamination of only 2%.…”
Section: Have We Found Any Good Pulx Candidates?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histogram of persistent X-ray luminosities for ULX sources was calculated using values from the ULX source catalog available in ref. [143]. We adopt a typical luminosity definition of L X ≥ 10 39 erg s -1 for ULX sources.…”
Section: Comparisons To X-ray Sources and Transientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift) (Gehrels et al 2004) is capable of observing simultaneously in both the UV and X-ray bands via its UVOT (Roming et al 2005) and XRT (Burrows et al 2005) cameras, and so provides a unique opportunity to explore whether observations of ULXs are consistent with any of the predictions discussed above. We begin by creating our ULX sample by crossmatching several ULX catalogues, (Earnshaw et al 2019;Kovlakas et al 2020;Bernadich et al 2022;Walton et al 2022) with the Swift Master Catalogue (SWIFTMASTR), accessible via HEASARC 1 . For the sake of comparison to nearby sources where data quality is high, we also include three extensively studied Galactic sources which reach super-Eddington rates of accretion, Swift J0243.6+6124, SS433 and V404 Cygni.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%