2018
DOI: 10.17226/24775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Expanded Functional Classification System for Highways and Streets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A criterion suggested for setting speed limits that is relatively new is “context – location.” Some may consider “road characteristics” or “environment”– terms currently in the MUTCD – to be similar in concept. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 855 ( 8 ) recommends an expanded functional classification system with five roadway types (freeways, principal arterial, minor arterial, collector, and local) and five contexts (rural, rural town, suburban, urban, and urban core). These contexts “have been determined to not only represent unique land use environments, but also identify distinctions that require wholly different geometric design practices in relation to desired operating speeds, mobility/access demands and user groups” ( 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A criterion suggested for setting speed limits that is relatively new is “context – location.” Some may consider “road characteristics” or “environment”– terms currently in the MUTCD – to be similar in concept. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 855 ( 8 ) recommends an expanded functional classification system with five roadway types (freeways, principal arterial, minor arterial, collector, and local) and five contexts (rural, rural town, suburban, urban, and urban core). These contexts “have been determined to not only represent unique land use environments, but also identify distinctions that require wholly different geometric design practices in relation to desired operating speeds, mobility/access demands and user groups” ( 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 855 ( 8 ) recommends an expanded functional classification system with five roadway types (freeways, principal arterial, minor arterial, collector, and local) and five contexts (rural, rural town, suburban, urban, and urban core). These contexts “have been determined to not only represent unique land use environments, but also identify distinctions that require wholly different geometric design practices in relation to desired operating speeds, mobility/access demands and user groups” ( 8 ). Should the MUTCD recognize these different roadway type/context combinations especially if different speed limit setting practices are suggested for the different roadway type/context combinations? This is a detail of setting speed limits and would be better as a subject of guidelines (or statutory change/requirements) rather than the MUTCD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The philosophy of complete streets, context-sensitive design, and context-sensitive solutions are examples of where the consideration of the roadway context is factored into the decision-making process. These ideals were also reinforced by the recent publication of a series of related NCHRP research reports that developed an expanded functional classification system, explored a performance-based design process, or advanced guidance on integrating safety and cost-effectiveness in design (4,(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Selecting the Base Format For Sls-proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of NCHRP Research Report 855 An Expanded Functional Classification System for Highways and Streets during the early stages of NCHRP 17-76 outlined contexts beyond urban and rural and facilitated accommodation of modes other than personal vehicles (4). The timing of this report, along with the increased activity by states and cities in exploring alternative methods for setting posted speed limits (see following sections) provided the opportunity for the NCHRP 17-76 research team to better integrate consideration of context into a refined speed limit setting procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDOT adapted the measure thresholds using research and guidance from the CNU, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), state and regional agencies (8)(9)(10), and case studies of places throughout the state. While FDOT was developing its context classification system, parallel research efforts proposed similar measures, including NCHRP Research Report 855: An Expanded Functional Classification for Highways and Streets (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%