2014
DOI: 10.21742/ijdcasd.2014.1.1.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exhaustive Survey on Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental evaluation is conducted in two sections. Table 1 describes the first set (S 1 ) of benchmark functions consisting of (F 1 − F 17 ) functions [27] along with their definitions, range of features, global minimum fitness, optimal position values, and categories. Moreover, to validate the robustness, the second set (S 2 ) contains (C 1 − C 28 ) real-parameter single-objective unconstrained optimization functions [78] which are briefed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental evaluation is conducted in two sections. Table 1 describes the first set (S 1 ) of benchmark functions consisting of (F 1 − F 17 ) functions [27] along with their definitions, range of features, global minimum fitness, optimal position values, and categories. Moreover, to validate the robustness, the second set (S 2 ) contains (C 1 − C 28 ) real-parameter single-objective unconstrained optimization functions [78] which are briefed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N, k, and t correspond to the number of feature vectors, number of clusters, and number of iterations respectively. Table 1 The considered standard benchmark functions [27] S.No. Ackley…”
Section: Time Complexity Of Kigsa-c Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 2010 till now there are numerous algorithms have been proposed in the literature that are surveyed in many papers like [61]- [71]. Each of these algorithms have its own pros and cons, however, due to lack of space we only mention the common drawbacks between them: they mostly need great effort to utilize, they have complicated parts or details therefore it is hard to understand, inefficient number of iteration and lack of optimum coverage time.…”
Section: Brief History Of Evolutionary Algorithms and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few swarm intelligence survey papers available in literature which provides theoretical description followed by algorithms of swarm intelligence techniques like bat algorithm, ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization, and so on. Most of these algorithms are old and they are discussed from biological optimization point of view, they lack application and performance point of view description [7][8][9]. Swarm artificial intelligence techniques which are developed recently includes ageist spider monkey, shark smell optimization, whale optimization, lion optimization, spider, antlion optimization, jellyfish food search, eagle search, elephant, raven roosting, dragonfly, crow search and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%