2022
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exemplar Frontal Plane Visual Kinematic Stimulus Elicits Sex-Specific Learned Behavior: An Exploratory Report

Abstract: An exemplar frontal plane visual kinematic stimulus elicits sex-specific learned behavior: An exploratory report. J Strength Cond Res 36(3): 857-861, 2022-The purpose of this exploratory study was to determine if a visually delivered kinematic stimulus designed to promote injuryresistant biomechanics would induce sex-specific motor learning effects. Six female subjects and 6 male subjects participated in 2 consecutive day sessions in which they mimicked an avatar performing 5 sets of 8 repetitions of exemplar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary analysis consisted of three 3x2 repeated measures ANOVAs (between factor: Group [control, AS, EE]; within factor: Time [baseline, post-test]), for measures of peak knee abduction, peak hip adduction, and peak trunk ipsilateral lean. Given the preliminary pilot and proof of concept nature of this study and consistent with similar prior work (Hogg et al, 2022;Williams et al, 2022), we used effect sizes (η p 2 and Cohen's d) to interpret the magnitude of main effects and interactions. We interpreted η p 2 effect sizes as small (.01), moderate (.06), and large (.14) and Cohen's d effect sizes as small (0.2), moderate (0.5) and large (0.8) as according to Cohen (Cohen, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our primary analysis consisted of three 3x2 repeated measures ANOVAs (between factor: Group [control, AS, EE]; within factor: Time [baseline, post-test]), for measures of peak knee abduction, peak hip adduction, and peak trunk ipsilateral lean. Given the preliminary pilot and proof of concept nature of this study and consistent with similar prior work (Hogg et al, 2022;Williams et al, 2022), we used effect sizes (η p 2 and Cohen's d) to interpret the magnitude of main effects and interactions. We interpreted η p 2 effect sizes as small (.01), moderate (.06), and large (.14) and Cohen's d effect sizes as small (0.2), moderate (0.5) and large (0.8) as according to Cohen (Cohen, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We engaged 45 participants (21 male and 24 female) in a single 90-minute research session (Table 1) (Hogg et al, 2022; Williams et al, 2022). Of these, 41 reported prior engagement in moderate-to-vigorous exercise for 30 minutes, three times a week.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations