An Executable Unified Product Model Based on UML to Support Satellite Design

Größ, Johannes; Reichwein, Axel; Rudolph, Stephan; Bock, Dagmar; Laufer, René

doi:10.2514/6.2009-6642

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gross et al describe the use of UML to integrate CATIA CAD models with Matlab/Simulink simulations for satellites [9]. The presented CAD integration approach captures many details for each part and integrates parts using constraint classes.…”

Section: Cad Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Automated Exploration and Assembly of Vehicle Design Models

Wrenn

Nagel

Owens

et al. 2012

Volume 2: 32nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts a and B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We describe the use of the Cyber-Physical Modeling Language (CyPhyML) to support trade studies and integration activities in system-level vehicle designs. CyPhyML captures integration interfaces across multiple design domains for system components, and generic design assembly rules given in terms of architecture alternatives. The CyPhyML tools support automated exploration of system-level architectural and parametric tradeoffs using a suite of design exploration tools that can be applied to models at different levels of fidelity and scale. Our overall approach includes exploration over the space of potential designs by evaluating structural combinations and then comparison of designs by simulating the dynamics of systems and subsystems with varying degrees of detail. In that flow, we use the DESERT toolkit for design tradeoffs that can be evaluated from the structure of the design model (i.e. interconnections of components and their parameters). DESERT extends a graphical modeling language with concepts and relations to define structural alternatives and constraints on system properties. Alternatives are given in an abstract way, decoupled from the details of the encoding of the combinatorial design space problem for the underlying binary decision diagram (BDD) solver. For desirable design instance models, the tools automatically assemble complete vehicle or subsystem computer-aided design (CAD) models from the associated component CAD models, and likewise create detailed finite-element structural analysis (FEA) models for selected component assemblies. Evaluation results are presented in a dashboard display which provides comparisons between different valid designs over all specified design metrics.

show abstract

Section: Cad Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Automated Exploration and Assembly of Vehicle Design Models

Wrenn

Nagel

Owens

et al. 2012

Volume 2: 32nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts a and B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Method of Virtual Test Based on Model Checking and a Case Study

Qiqige

Yang

et al. 2016

Proceedings of 2016 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic literature review of cross-domain model consistency checking by model management tools

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The goal of this study is to identify gaps and challenges related to cross-domain model management focusing on consistency checking. Method We conducted a systematic literature review. We used the keyword-based search on Google Scholar, and we identified 618 potentially relevant studies; after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 96 papers were selected for further analysis. Results The main findings/contributions are: (i) a list of available tools used to support model management; (ii) 40% of the tools can provide consistency checking on models of different domains and 25% on models of the same domain, and 35% do not provide any consistency checking; (iii) available strategies to keep the consistency between models of different domains are not mature enough; (iv) most of the tools that provide consistency checking on models of different domains can only capture up to two inconsistency types; (v) the main challenges associated with tools that manage models on different domains are related to interoperability between tools and the consistency maintenance. Conclusion The results presented in this study can be used to guide new research on maintaining the consistency between models of different domains. Example of further research is to investigate how to capture the Behavioral and Refinement inconsistency types. This study also indicates that the tools should be improved in order to address, for example, more kinds of consistency check.

show abstract

An Executable Unified Product Model Based on UML to Support Satellite Design

Cited by 5 publications

References 11 publications

Towards Automated Exploration and Assembly of Vehicle Design Models

Towards Automated Exploration and Assembly of Vehicle Design Models

A Method of Virtual Test Based on Model Checking and a Case Study

A systematic literature review of cross-domain model consistency checking by model management tools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About