2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0749-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An example of solute spreading in nonstationary, bounded geological formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in trending media ignoring the influence of the boundary conditions may give erroneous conclusions on estimation of the transport process. The results of flow and solute transport in finite domains may be not consistent with those obtained for an unbounded domain and differences vary also with the different imposed constraints [ 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in trending media ignoring the influence of the boundary conditions may give erroneous conclusions on estimation of the transport process. The results of flow and solute transport in finite domains may be not consistent with those obtained for an unbounded domain and differences vary also with the different imposed constraints [ 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last two terms do not exist for stationary Lagrangian flow fields [7] and for any constant expected value of the velocity field [9,11]. In such cases, the particle displacement variance X ij becomes spatially constant, Eq.…”
Section: Solute Transport In Nonstationary Velocity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then, the transport moments of a conservative solute plume are computed from the velocity statistics by a Lagrangian approach limited to the first-order. This approach was recently used to analyze the case of the medium nonstationarity induced by a trend in the mean log-conductivity in bounded domains [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solute transport in aquifers is controlled by the spatial variability of flow velocity (e.g., Rubin et al 1994;Fiori et al 2003;Darvini 2013). Stochastic environmental risk assessment considers the effects of variability (uncertainty) in flow fields on contaminated groundwater (e.g., Maxwell and Kastenberg 1999;Guadagnini and Tartakovsky 2010;Pedretti et al 2019;Muniruzzaman and Pedretti, 2021).…”
Section: Variability Of the Integrated Specific Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%