2008
DOI: 10.7146/math.scand.a-15056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An example of a bounded $\mathsf C$-convex domain which is not biholomorphic to a convex domain

Abstract: We show that the symmetrized bidisc is a C-convex domain. This provides an example of a bounded C-convex domain which cannot be exhausted by domains biholomorphic to convex domains.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 32F17.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the hyperconvexity of G 2 (see e.g. [13]) together with the maximum principle for subharmonic functions gives the equivalence of the two latter conditions. Let us also denote Φ ω (x) := (…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the hyperconvexity of G 2 (see e.g. [13]) together with the maximum principle for subharmonic functions gives the equivalence of the two latter conditions. Let us also denote Φ ω (x) := (…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The linear convexity of G 2 (see e.g. [13]) implies that there is a line l = {(s, p) ∈ C 2 : as+bp = c} with Φ ω (x) ∈ l and l∩G 2 = ∅. Then x ∈ L := {y ∈ C 3 : ay 1 +aωy 2 +bωy 3 = c} and, as one may easily check, L ∩ E = ∅.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[26]), there is an affine complex line L ⊂ C r 1 such that L ∩ G r 1 = ∅ and the set L ∩ G r 1 either is not connected or is not simply connected. Consequently, L := L × {0} N −r 1 ⊂ C N is an affine complex line such that L ∩ E E = ∅ and the set L ∩ E E either is not connected or is not simply connected.…”
Section: Corollary 313 E E Is Not Circledmentioning
confidence: 97%