2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination over time of language and discourse production abilities following right hemisphere brain damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mackenzie & Brady, 2008). Discourse sample length in speakers after RBD is reportedly similar to, longer or shorter than that of NBD speakers (Brady, Armstrong, & Mackenzie, 2006;Cherney, Drimmer, & Halper, 1997;Lehman Blake, 2006;Marini et al, 2005;Uryase, Duffy, & Liles, 1990). Note that Trupe and Hillis (1985) found extremes of copious digressive output and a paucity of speech in their group of participants with RBD.…”
Section: Discourse Impairments Following Rbdmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mackenzie & Brady, 2008). Discourse sample length in speakers after RBD is reportedly similar to, longer or shorter than that of NBD speakers (Brady, Armstrong, & Mackenzie, 2006;Cherney, Drimmer, & Halper, 1997;Lehman Blake, 2006;Marini et al, 2005;Uryase, Duffy, & Liles, 1990). Note that Trupe and Hillis (1985) found extremes of copious digressive output and a paucity of speech in their group of participants with RBD.…”
Section: Discourse Impairments Following Rbdmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Note that Trupe and Hillis (1985) found extremes of copious digressive output and a paucity of speech in their group of participants with RBD. Time post-onset may be a significant factor; reduced speech output occurred up to six months postonset (Brady et al, 2006) or conversely, returned to normal at one year post-onset . Participants with RBD are generally considered to have little or no impairment of syntactic skills.…”
Section: Discourse Impairments Following Rbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this variable was the most heterogeneous, this could provide hints regarding the profile of evolution of the manifestation, even though that profile could be very heterogeneous among individuals. Very little research has been conducted so far regarding language recovery over time in individuals with RBD and mismatching results can be found in the literature: one study [37] demonstrated that no spontaneous recovery was found in discourse until 6 months after onset, while another [38] reported significant improvement between 1, 6 and 12 months. In this study, it seems that patients in the most chronic phase after stroke exhibit a profile characterized mainly by conversational and emotional prosody impairments, while other disorders seem to diminish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary clinical assessment tends to focus on the analysis of connected (and often spontaneous) discourse with the aim of providing descriptive evaluations of individuals' communicative and pragmatic abilities [40] . This approach may be limited in replicability (although early efforts to demonstrate the relative stability of such approaches has proved promising [41,42] ). However, in clinical practice, where replicablility is less essential but there is a greater imperative to be inclusive, speech and language specialists generally provide tailored assessments of patients' communication needs, which would be pertinent to their participation in depression diagnosis procedures.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%