2011
DOI: 10.1353/etc.2011.0039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Typical Classroom Context and Instruction for Students With and Without Behavioral Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to peer relationships, our finding that disobedience has more impact on peer rejection than acceptance, whereas peer rejection and acceptance were equally important for boys' development of disobedience, indicates that both positive and negative peer relationships are important for boys' disobedience development, but that when boys show undesirable behavior, they may easily acquire a 'bad' reputation which is difficult to lose (Baumeister et al 2001). The finding that negative social relationships more strongly impacted boys' classroom behavior than positive social relationships, is especially important for boys in special education, as these children not only already encounter more negative social interactions (Humphrey and Symes 2010;Little and Kobak 2003;Murray and Greenberg 2001), but also receive three times more punishment than children without social-emotional and behavioral disorders (Scott et al 2011). It is thus vital to prevent the development of negative interactional patterns in special educational settings.…”
Section: Positive Versus Negative Social Experiences and Boys' Behavimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to peer relationships, our finding that disobedience has more impact on peer rejection than acceptance, whereas peer rejection and acceptance were equally important for boys' development of disobedience, indicates that both positive and negative peer relationships are important for boys' disobedience development, but that when boys show undesirable behavior, they may easily acquire a 'bad' reputation which is difficult to lose (Baumeister et al 2001). The finding that negative social relationships more strongly impacted boys' classroom behavior than positive social relationships, is especially important for boys in special education, as these children not only already encounter more negative social interactions (Humphrey and Symes 2010;Little and Kobak 2003;Murray and Greenberg 2001), but also receive three times more punishment than children without social-emotional and behavioral disorders (Scott et al 2011). It is thus vital to prevent the development of negative interactional patterns in special educational settings.…”
Section: Positive Versus Negative Social Experiences and Boys' Behavimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of "non-verbal teacher behavior" is supported in the current literature on this subject (Scott, Alter, & Him, 2011), and may provide a more realistic picture of teacher behavior. These suggestions support the purpose of the Observation of Teacher Behavior system and are logical next steps in the development of a system designed to provide teachers with the data needed to motivate behavior change.…”
Section: Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement seems an exaggeration, but the evidence supports the underlying message. All told, the rates of positive to negative feedback are very low (Scott, Alter, & Him, 2011; and, as will be described below, may work to maintain cycles of coercion between teacher and student that limit the amount of reciprocity in the classroom. Teachers often self-report themselves as more positive than naturalistic observations have borne out (Nicholas, Olympia & Jenson, 2001).…”
Section: The Passage Of Public Law 107-110 Of2002 (The Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite decades of research demonstrating powerful effects, teachers continue to use positive feedback at very low rates, which has been a persistent problem (e.g., Scott, Alter, & Hirn, 2011;White, 1975). For example, in a review of studies of teacher feedback from 1970 -2000, Beaman and Wheldall (2000) found teachers engaged in relatively low rates of positive feedback, much more often responding to inappropriate student behavior with negative feedback.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the effectiveness of positive feedback and longstanding researcher recommendations that it be used frequently, direct observation studies of classrooms have demonstrated that positive feedback has continued for decades to naturally occur at very low rates (e.g., Beaman & Wheldall, 2000;Scott et al, 2011;White, 1975). Thus, the key issue has transitioned from identifying positive feedback as an effective practice to establishing effective interventions to change teacher behavior.…”
Section: Feedback Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%