1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)90012-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the working case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 1994 case definition addressed criticisms of prior diagnostic criteria, it was not considered definitive (9). Since being proposed, the revised case definition has not been validated and questions remain about whether it reliably distinguishes a unique disease from psychiatric disorders (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Chronic Fatigue Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 1994 case definition addressed criticisms of prior diagnostic criteria, it was not considered definitive (9). Since being proposed, the revised case definition has not been validated and questions remain about whether it reliably distinguishes a unique disease from psychiatric disorders (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Chronic Fatigue Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is not specifically stated if someone would meet this criterion if he or she has restorative sleep but other sleep problems such as difficulties falling asleep, maintaining sleep, or waking up early. Komaroff et al (1996) found that 98% of a chronically fatigued group had sleep disturbances, but only 89% reported awakening unrefreshed. To assess sleep difficulties, it is important to assess for dysfunction in areas beyond just nonrestorative sleep and include prolonged sleep (including frequent naps), disturbed sleep (e.g., inability to fall asleep or early awakening) and/or day/night reversal.…”
Section: Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More restrictive or more liberal criteria clearly have an effect on who is classified as having CFS but these different definitions also pose difficulties in interpreting results of related studies (Komaroff et al, 1996). To deal with these problems, there have been efforts to use statistical methods to classify symptoms of individuals with severe fatigue (Janal et al, 2006;Nisenbaum et al, 1998;Sullivan et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation also included a structured instrument, a modified version of the CFS questionnaire [18]. This instrument assesses the signs, symptoms, and medical history to rule out other disorders.…”
Section: Medical Assessment Of Cfsmentioning
confidence: 99%