2016
DOI: 10.1080/19496591.2016.1202835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of the Transformative Learning Potential of Alternative Spring Breaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the significantly increased scores in the affect subset of the MAS and self-efficacy of the experimental group indicate the effectiveness of direct contact and the hands-on experiences working with individuals with disabilities on the emotional attitudes of kinesiology students. Our findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that personal interactions and direct contacts are significant to change of attitude toward individuals with disabilities (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000;Vilchinsky et al, 2010) and self-efficacy (Mann & Deangelo, 2016).One's emotional reaction toward individuals with disabilities is considered innate and spontaneous and would be modified by additional contact (Vilchinsky et al, 2010). Contact with individuals with disabilities itself can somewhat remove feeling of rejection toward people with disabilities; however, overcoming anxiety and uneasy feeling, and seeing individuals with disabilities' ability to function in the context requires longer interaction with the person with disability (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…That is, the significantly increased scores in the affect subset of the MAS and self-efficacy of the experimental group indicate the effectiveness of direct contact and the hands-on experiences working with individuals with disabilities on the emotional attitudes of kinesiology students. Our findings are in line with previous studies suggesting that personal interactions and direct contacts are significant to change of attitude toward individuals with disabilities (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000;Vilchinsky et al, 2010) and self-efficacy (Mann & Deangelo, 2016).One's emotional reaction toward individuals with disabilities is considered innate and spontaneous and would be modified by additional contact (Vilchinsky et al, 2010). Contact with individuals with disabilities itself can somewhat remove feeling of rejection toward people with disabilities; however, overcoming anxiety and uneasy feeling, and seeing individuals with disabilities' ability to function in the context requires longer interaction with the person with disability (Fort et al, 2017;Rimmerman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One area of research characterizes the content knowledge and skills that students need to be literate about the nature and consequences of social-group differences (e.g., perspective taking, systemic thinking; Adams et al, 2007; Au, 2009; Banks, 2007; Freire, 2001; Ladson-Billings, 1995; Noddings, 2005; Sleeter & Grant, 2009). A second area identifies pedagogical strategies that successfully help students learn about social-group differences (e.g., building greater self-awareness, critiquing stereotypes, celebrating aspects of one’s culture; e.g., Bertaux, Smythe, & Crable, 2012; Butin, 2007; Cammarota, 2011; Christens & Kirshner, 2011; Ginwright & James, 2002; Westheimer & Kahne, 2004). A third area examines institutional strategies that can help make schools and classrooms more inclusive and empowering spaces for students from diverse backgrounds (e.g., changes to teacher training or institutional design; Ball, 2000; Brayboy & Castagno, 2009; Darling-Hammond, French, & Garcia-Lopez, 2002; Delpit, 1995; Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, 1995, 2014; Morrison, Robbins, & Rose, 2008; Paris & Alim, 2017; Sleeter, 1996, 2011).…”
Section: Supporting Evidence From Multicultural and Social Justice Edmentioning
confidence: 99%