2020 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icdmw51313.2020.00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of the State-of-the-Art for Multivariate Time Series Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent empirical surveys (Ruiz et al, 2020;Dhariyal et al, 2020) provide a detailed overview of progress in MTSC. This section describes a subset of the MTSC classifiers discussed in these surveys, that we used in this work to evaluate the impact of channel selection methods.…”
Section: Multivariate Time Series Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recent empirical surveys (Ruiz et al, 2020;Dhariyal et al, 2020) provide a detailed overview of progress in MTSC. This section describes a subset of the MTSC classifiers discussed in these surveys, that we used in this work to evaluate the impact of channel selection methods.…”
Section: Multivariate Time Series Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the impact of channel selection, we work with recent multivariate time series classifiers, ROCKET (Dempster et al, 2020), Weasel-Muse (Schäfer and Leser, 2018) and MrSEQL-SAX (Le Nguyen et al, 2019a). These approaches were shown to have state-of-the-art accuracy and can complete training and prediction on the full UEA MTSC benchmark in less than 7 days (Dhariyal et al, 2020;Ruiz et al, 2020). One important aspect of the classifiers mentioned above is that they use data from all the channels during training, and it is evident from the accuracy and runtime of these algorithms that this is not the best strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing reviews for time-series classification focus on comparing algorithms that do not generate early predictions. Representative reviews for standard time-series classification methods, as well as their empirical comparison can be found in [1], [4], [8], [11], [34]. Furthermore, ETSC methods are mostly evaluated and compared against only a few alternative algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must mention that the superiority of ROCKET was also reported in independent works for other (not necessarily multivariate) time series classification tasks, including the studies delivered by Dempster et al [9]- [11], Salehinejad et al [33], Pantiskas et al [30] and more. Among papers emphasizing the superiority of ROCKET is the work of Dhariyal et al [8] who focused on the comparisons of ROCKET with neural approaches. The authors conclude their findings saying that "recent deep learning MTSC methods do not perform as well as expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%