An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation

Welch, Robert B.; Widawski, Mel H.; Harrington, Janice N.; Warren, David H.

doi:10.3758/bf03198798

Cited by 59 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the question of which of active and passive haptic exploration is superior is not yet settled (see Symmons, Richardson, & Wuillemin, 2004), it is possible that active haptic control will increase reliance on haptic information in the bimodal task. Welch, Widawski, Harrington, and Warren (1979) suggested that visual dominance is facilitated by degrading proprioception and kinesthesis. They argued that passive movements play a role in this degradation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size

Doorn

Richardson

Wuillemin

et al. 2010

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size

Doorn

Richardson

Wuillemin

et al. 2010

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Most explanations refer to the unimodal acuity or precision for the perceptual property that is being assessed (e.g. Welch et al, 1979; see Welch & Warren, 1980, for a review of the early literature). This is entirely in accord with the previously reviewed studies showing a visual advantage for spatial judgments and an auditory advantage for temporal judgments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order.

Ley

Haggard²,

Yarrow

2009

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Stimuli were auditory, vibrotactile, or both. The temporal profiles of vibrotactile stimuli were manipulated, producing three levels of TOJ precision. In bimodal conditions, the asynchrony between the two unimodal stimuli comprising a bimodal stimulus was also manipulated to determine the weight given to touch. Unimodal data were used to predict bimodal performance on two measures: judgment uncertainty and tactile weight. A model relying exclusively on audition was rejected based on both measures. A second model selecting the best input on each trial did not predict the reduced judgment uncertainty observed in bimodal trials. Only the optimal maximum-likelihood-estimation model predicted both judgment uncertainties and weights, extending its validity to TOJs. We discuss alternatives for modelling the process of event sequencing based on integrated multisensory inputs. Permanent repository link

show abstract

“…If one instructs or permits subjects to attend to nonvisual information, visual dominance can be reduced, or even eliminated (Easton, in press;Warren & Schmitt, 1978). Also, if the precision of perceptual judgments of nonvisual information is sufficiently enhanced, visual dominance is found to decrease (Easton, in press;Welch, Widawski, Harrington, & Warren, 1979). Finally, if nonvisual information is appropriate or ecologically valid for the task at band, visualbias can be lessened (Lederman, 1979).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptual dominance during lipreading

Easton

Basala

1982

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two experiments were performed under visual-only and visual-auditory discrepancy conditions (dubs) to assess observers' abilities to read speech information on a face. In the first experiment, identification and multiple choice testing were used. In addition, the relation between visual and auditory phonetic information was manipulated and related to perceptual bias. In the eecond experiment, the "eompellingn8ls" of the visual·auditory discrepancy as a single speech event was manipulated. Subjects alao rated the confidence they had that their perception of the lipped word was accurate. Results indicated that competing visual information exerted little effect on auditory speech recognition, but visual speech recognition was substantially interfered with when discrepant auditory information was present. The extent of auditory bias was found to be related to the abilities of observers to read speech under nondiscrepancy conditions, the magnitude of the visual-auditory discrepancy, and the compellingness of the visual-auditory discrepancy as a single event. Auditory bias during speech was found to be a moderately compelling conscious experience, and not simply a case of confused responding or guessing. Results were discussed in terms of current models of perceptual dominance and related to results from modality discordance during space perception.

show abstract

An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation

Cited by 59 publications

References 19 publications

Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size

Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size

Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order.

Perceptual dominance during lipreading

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About