1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(199805)18:3<297::aid-fut4>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the relationship between stock index cash and futures markets: A cointegration approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cointegrating vector is taken to be t t F S − . This is included in a VECM, together with a constant term, and the specification is estimated over the full sample (see Pizzi, Economopoulos, andO'Neill (1998), Chu, Hsieh, and, Booth, So, and Tse (1999)). …”
Section: A Cointegration In Futures/spot Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cointegrating vector is taken to be t t F S − . This is included in a VECM, together with a constant term, and the specification is estimated over the full sample (see Pizzi, Economopoulos, andO'Neill (1998), Chu, Hsieh, and, Booth, So, and Tse (1999)). …”
Section: A Cointegration In Futures/spot Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (e.g. Fleming et al, 1996;Kempf and Korn, 1996;Pizzi et al, 1998) have used ARMA residuals rather than log returns when estimating the ECM. The problem with this approach is that it combines an error correction term directly derived from the index and futures price levels with the ARMA residuals in one model, thereby introducing a sort of inconsistency into the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these findings, there are some studies which could not determine the conclusive role of any market but bi-directional causality. These studies have found bi-directional causality in spot and futures returns of S&P 500 and reveal that causality from futures to spot is stronger as compared to causality from spot to futures returns (Chan, 1992;De Jong and Nijman, 1997;Pizzi et al, 1998).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%