2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the professional development needs of out-of-field mathematics teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, a paperand-pencil test, developed to examine Irish post-primary out-of-field mathematics teachers' knowledge of curriculum-aligned content (see Ní Ríordáin, Paolucci, and O' Dwyer 2017) was utilised in the study. The TEDS-M conceptual framework supported the development of item design for the paper-and-pencil test (Ní Ríordáin, Paolucci, and O' Dwyer 2017;Tatto et al 2008). The TEDS-M study examined the professional knowledge of pre-service mathematics teachers across 21 countries (Schmidt et al 2008).…”
Section: Test Instrument and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, a paperand-pencil test, developed to examine Irish post-primary out-of-field mathematics teachers' knowledge of curriculum-aligned content (see Ní Ríordáin, Paolucci, and O' Dwyer 2017) was utilised in the study. The TEDS-M conceptual framework supported the development of item design for the paper-and-pencil test (Ní Ríordáin, Paolucci, and O' Dwyer 2017;Tatto et al 2008). The TEDS-M study examined the professional knowledge of pre-service mathematics teachers across 21 countries (Schmidt et al 2008).…”
Section: Test Instrument and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognisant of this we examine the mathematical content knowledge (MCK) of pre-service mathematics teachers (N = 85) commencing their consecutive teacher education programmes (graduate pathway) in an Irish context involving four universities. For the purposes of this study, MCK is concerned with 'an understanding of mathematics concepts anticipated to be taught' (Norton 2019, 530) and, accordingly, pre-service teachers' proficiency with curriculum-aligned content (Ní Ríordáin, Paolucci, and O' Dwyer 2017). In addition, we investigate MCK in relation to participants' undergraduate degree studies in order to examine if a relationship exists between the type of degree undertaken and mathematical proficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detail description/explanation of differentiated instruction implementation in mathematics classroom can be an insight of mathematics teachers to implement the differentiated instruction in their classroom. Further, teachers' teaching experience in a teacher professional development affects the teachers' mathematical knowledge (Ríordáin, Paolucci, & O' Dwyer, 2017).…”
Section: Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, support for teachers in implementing a new curriculum would assist teachers and students (Roblin et al, 2018) as practical approach results in students' achievement (Ríordain et al, 2017;Fischer et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%