An examination of the language construct in NIMH's research domain criteria: Time for reconceptualization!

Abstract

The National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Initiative “calls for the development of new ways of classifying psychopathology based on dimensions of observable behavior.” As a result of this ambitious initiative, language has been identified as an independent construct in the RDoC matrix. In this article, we frame language within an evolutionary and neuropsychological context and discuss some of the limitations to the current measurements of language. Findings from genomics and the neuroimaging of performance during language tasks are discussed in relation to serious mental illness and within the context of caveats regarding measuring language. Indeed, the data collection and analysis methods employed to assay language have been both aided and constrained by the available technologies, methodologies, and conceptual definitions. Consequently, different fields of language research show inconsistent definitions of language that have become increasingly broad over time. Individually, they have also shown significant improvements in conceptual resolution, as well as in experimental and analytic techniques. More recently, language research has embraced collaborations across disciplines, notably neuroscience, cognitive science, and computational linguistics and has ultimately re‐defined classical ideas of language. As we move forward, the new models of language with their remarkably multifaceted constructs force a re‐examination of the NIMH RDoC conceptualization of language and thus the neuroscience and genetics underlying this concept. © 2016 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Action of Verbal and Non-verbal Communication in the Therapeutic Alliance Construction: A Mixed Methods Approach to Assess the Initial Interactions With Depressed Patients

“…Patients, therefore, live the therapeutic relationship and the alliance construction by manifesting different experiential and behavioral modalities through verbal and non-verbal communication (Tomicic et al, 2009;Valdés and Krause, 2015), as an expression of their psychological processes and symptoms (Valdés, 2014;Elvevåg et al, 2016). Depressed patients, in particular, show difficulties in developing and maintaining the TA because of the specific verbal and non-verbal correlates that define their communicative behaviors (Balsters et al, 2012;Smirnova et al, 2018).…”

Editorial: Time to give up on Autism Spectrum Disorder?

“…Consider proposed RDoC domains such as attention or language [cf. Elvevag et al, 2016]. It is obvious that these cannot fulfill criteria for RDoC constructs, if only because they do not have validity as a "functional unit of behavior or cognitive processes" [Cuthbert, 2015].…”

Clinical state tracking in serious mental illness through computational analysis of speech

“…Novel data sources from mobile devices and sensors, are increasingly being explored to fill this gap [14]. Recently, there has also been growing interest in the use of language as a biologically-relevant, dimensional phenotype [8,15,16]. Language provides contextual information relating to an individual's life experiences and is sensitive to underlying neuro-psychiatric states.…”