An examination of the importance of performances in youth and junior competition as an indicator of later success in tennis

Abstract

Talent identification at a young age is deemed essential for many national sporting organisations to increase the chances of success for their players on the international stage. Talent identification methods can be imprecise and national tennis associations and coaches often identify talent based on performances at youth tournaments and junior rankings. However, not much is known about the relationship between the international competition performances of young tennis players and later success. This relationship is explored in this study using comparisons based on: (a) the results of 3,521 players at U14 youth tournaments; (b) the rankings of 377 junior players (U18) by the International Tennis Federation; (c) the rankings of 727 professional male players by the Association of Tennis Professionals; and (d) the rankings of 779 professional players by the Women's Tennis Association. Junior performances (U18) and performances at youth tournaments (U14) appear to have a low success rate in predicting later success. No distinct age was found at which players should start to perform in order to be successful at the professional level. It is concluded that even though good performances at young ages increase athletes' chances to become elite players, they are not a precondition for achieving later success. Therefore, this study informs talent scouts, sport development officers, coaches and high performance managers of the role that performances at international youth competitions may play in talent identification in tennis.

Burnout in Elite Tennis Players of Different Junior Categories

“…Furthermore, performance in this category is an important indicator of later success in tennis. 25 Devaluation may be related to decreased motivation and interest in the sport. 3 Therefore, differences found in the levels of sports devaluation in CAT18 athletes may reflect not only changes in the competitive environment, but also a decision period for the athlete, as to whether or not to pursue a professional career.…”

Assessing personal talent determinants in young racquet sport players: a systematic review

“…Children need to have gathered enough competition points or a certain ranking position to qualify for a specific team and/or training level. However, as in many other sports, junior performance seems to have little predictive value for future success in racquet sport (Brouwers, De Bosscher, & Sotiriadou, 2012;Heller, 2008;Reid, Crespo, Santilli, Miley, & Dimmock, 2007). Ranking positions at a young age are influenced to a large extent by differences in maturation and growth processes, development and learning curves, training experience (i.e.…”

Predicting the Evolution of Sports Federation Membership: AnImportant Tool to Asses National Governing Bodies’ Strategic Planning

“…Several studies predict the number of spectators in a sporting event or in a sports centre based on the satisfaction of previous experiences or results based on the level of training of the athletes; some studies predict the number of medals or awards in a sports competition based on different elements, which are more qualitative than quantitative [32].…”