2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the fundamental mechanics of cutting force coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Fontaine et al [8] the analytical models focus mainly on the physical mechanisms of chip formation, as slip stress and strain. In contrast, the mechanistic models estimate cutting forces based on the assumption that their values are proportional to the sectional area of cut and specific cutting force coefficients [9]. These models can be used to estimate the cutting forces for a selected combination of cutting parameters and tool geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fontaine et al [8] the analytical models focus mainly on the physical mechanisms of chip formation, as slip stress and strain. In contrast, the mechanistic models estimate cutting forces based on the assumption that their values are proportional to the sectional area of cut and specific cutting force coefficients [9]. These models can be used to estimate the cutting forces for a selected combination of cutting parameters and tool geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies coefficients are higher at low speed, showing a decrease and then increasing again in high speed area. On the contrary according to Wang et al [15] cutting coefficient is constantly varying with cutting velocity, but only a limited range of speeds has been tested (10-30 m/min). Anyhow all these analyses are affected by uncertainties and errors derived from measuring cutting forces at high rotational speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice it is estimated by the average or the mean deviation from the mean as shown in (2). For the chosen workpiece and tool material combination, Wang et al (2014) used average forces for X and Y directions [12].…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%