An examination of the effectiveness of video modelling intervention using a speech-generating device in preschool children at risk for autism

Copple, Karen; Koul, Rajinder; Banda, Devender R.; Frye, Ellen M.

doi:10.3109/17518423.2014.880079

“…Thirty-eight studies published from 1974 to 2018 comprised the final sample included in the review (Figure 1). Among studies included in this review, seven used classical cinematherapy (Turley and Derdeyn, 1990;Heston and Kottman, 1997;Bierman et al, 2003;Marsick, 2010;Gramaglia et al, 2011;Ballard, 2012;Egeci and Gençöz, 2017), 9 used video modeling approach (Charlop and Milstein, 1989;Reeve et al, 2007;Scattone, 2008;Coughlin et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2014;Copple et al, 2015;Macpherson et al, 2015;von Maffei et al, 2015;Walsh et al, 2018), 5 applied video peer modeling (Morris et al, 1974;Muzekari, 1976;Corbett et al, 2011;Perlick et al, 2011;Brown et al, 2016), 1 used video self-modeling, (Wilkes et al, 2011), one combined video peer modeling and video self-modeling (Decker and Buggey, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A critical appraisal of research in arts, health and wellbeing

2023

Frontiers Research Topics

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

“…Thirty-eight studies published from 1974 to 2018 comprised the final sample included in the review (Figure 1). Among studies included in this review, seven used classical cinematherapy (Turley and Derdeyn, 1990;Heston and Kottman, 1997;Bierman et al, 2003;Marsick, 2010;Gramaglia et al, 2011;Ballard, 2012;Egeci and Gençöz, 2017), 9 used video modeling approach (Charlop and Milstein, 1989;Reeve et al, 2007;Scattone, 2008;Coughlin et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2014;Copple et al, 2015;Macpherson et al, 2015;von Maffei et al, 2015;Walsh et al, 2018), 5 applied video peer modeling (Morris et al, 1974;Muzekari, 1976;Corbett et al, 2011;Perlick et al, 2011;Brown et al, 2016), 1 used video self-modeling, (Wilkes et al, 2011), one combined video peer modeling and video self-modeling (Decker and Buggey, 2014).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thirty-eight studies published from 1974 to 2018 comprised the final sample included in the review ( Figure 1 ). Among studies included in this review, seven used classical cinematherapy ( Turley and Derdeyn, 1990 ; Heston and Kottman, 1997 ; Bierman et al, 2003 ; Marsick, 2010 ; Gramaglia et al, 2011 ; Ballard, 2012 ; Eğeci and Gençöz, 2017 ), 9 used video modeling approach ( Charlop and Milstein, 1989 ; Reeve et al, 2007 ; Scattone, 2008 ; Coughlin et al, 2009 ; Jones et al, 2014 ; Copple et al, 2015 ; Macpherson et al, 2015 ; von Maffei et al, 2015 ; Walsh et al, 2018 ), 5 applied video peer modeling ( Morris et al, 1974 ; Muzekari, 1976 ; Corbett et al, 2011 ; Perlick et al, 2011 ; Brown et al, 2016 ), 1 used video self-modeling, ( Wilkes et al, 2011 ), one combined video peer modeling and video self-modeling ( Decker and Buggey, 2014 ). Eleven out of 38 studies used a generic video treatment ( Lee et al, 1983 ; Gelkopf et al, 1993 , 2006 ; Kimata, 2007 , 2008 ; Golan et al, 2010 ; Lim, 2010 ; Marx et al, 2010 ; Olatunji et al, 2012 ; Savorani et al, 2013 ; Yan et al, 2018 ), 1 with video feedback ( Thiemann and Goldstein, 2001 ), 1 with video prompting ( Rayner, 2011 ), 1 with video peer modeling and a generic video treatment ( Isong et al, 2014 ), and 1 with video joint modeling ( Dueñas et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other examples of pathologies in which video modeling is applied are ASD ( Charlop and Milstein, 1989 ; Lim, 2010 ; Isong et al, 2014 ; Copple et al, 2015 ; Macpherson et al, 2015 ), addiction ( Brown et al, 2016 ), schizophrenia ( Muzekari, 1976 ; von Maffei et al, 2015 ), anxiety ( Morris et al, 1974 ), dementia ( Marx et al, 2010 ; Savorani et al, 2013 ), and anorexia nervosa ( Gramaglia et al, 2011 ). It is also used for caregivers ( Perlick et al, 2011 ) and people with learning disabilities ( Decker and Buggey, 2014 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Through the Looking Glass: A Scoping Review of Cinema and Video Therapy

Sacilotto

¹

,

Villa

²

,

Salvi

³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cinematherapy and video treatments are artistic therapeutic techniques by which the individuals are exposed to their psycho-physical difficulties through the stories of the characters on the screen who are coping with the same issues that the patients are. Although these techniques are increasingly common within modern art therapies, there are neither comprehensive classifications of the different approaches nor agreement on their effectiveness. We performed a scoping review, describing different methodological approaches and outcome measures in cinematherapy and video treatments.Methodology: We searched articles in PubMed, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. We included: (i) articles in which subjects were treated for their difficulties with videos or films, (ii) articles written in English. Review articles and papers describing a research protocol without data collection were not included.Results: We analyzed 38 studies. Thirty-six reported a positive effect of the treatment. Seven studies used classical cinematherapy, adopting a qualitative approach to measure the therapy outcome. Thirty-one studies used different video treatments, 8 of which were defined as randomized controlled trials with specific objective therapy outcomes. Studies were mainly focused on behavioral and psychological difficulties in Autism Spectrum Disorders and Schizophrenia.Conclusion: Studies using video treatments more often rely upon structured experimental designs; on the contrary, those who used classical cinematherapy produced descriptive results. A more standardized methodological approach in terms of experimental design, procedure, and objective outcome measure is needed to provide evidence on the effectiveness of these techniques, promoting its application in the clinical field.

show abstract

“…Several meta-analyses have concluded that video modelling can be effectively used to promote the acquisition of a variety of academic, social, communicative and functional skills in autistic children and adolescents [29][30][31]. To our knowledge, video modelling has not been investigated as a potential tool for speech production training; however, it has been used to promote spontaneous requesting via speechgenerating devices [32] in participants with a similar profile to those in the current study.…”

mentioning

confidence: 75%

Feasibility of an app-based parent-mediated speech production intervention for minimally verbal autistic children: development and pilot testing of a new intervention

Saul

¹

,

Norbury

²

2020

Pilot Feasibility Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Training speech production skills may be a valid intervention target for minimally verbal autistic children. Intervention studies have explored various approaches albeit on a small scale and with limited experimental control or power. We therefore designed a novel app-based parent-mediated intervention based on insights from the video modelling and cued articulation literature and tested its acceptability and usage. Methods Consultation with the autism community refined the initial design and culminated in a pilot trial (n = 19) lasting 16 weeks. Participants were randomly allocated an intervention duration in an AB phase design and undertook weekly probes during baseline and intervention via the app. We evaluated the acceptability of the intervention via feedback questionnaires and examined the usability variables such as adherence to the testing and intervention schedule, time spent on the app and trials completed during the intervention phase. Results High acceptability scores indicated that families liked the overall goals and features of the app. Ten participants engaged meaningfully with the app, completing 82% of the test trials and uploading data in 61% of intervention weeks; however, of these, only three met the targeted 12.5 min of intervention per week. Conclusion We discuss the possible reasons for variability in usage data and how barriers to participation could be surmounted in the future development of this intervention.

show abstract

An examination of the effectiveness of video modelling intervention using a speech-generating device in preschool children at risk for autism

Abstract: Study findings indicate that a VM treatment package is effective in facilitating communication in children with little or no functional speech.

Cited by 15 publications

References 29 publications

A critical appraisal of research in arts, health and wellbeing

A critical appraisal of research in arts, health and wellbeing

Through the Looking Glass: A Scoping Review of Cinema and Video Therapy

Feasibility of an app-based parent-mediated speech production intervention for minimally verbal autistic children: development and pilot testing of a new intervention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About