2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the dynamic feature of WTC through dyadic group interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of correlation between observable communication and situated, moment‐to‐moment ratings of WTC reported by MacIntyre and Legatto (2011) mirrors the findings of an earlier study by Cao and Philp (2006), whereby self‐reported trait‐like measurements of eight overseas language school students’ WTC “indicated no clear correlations” (p. 485) with observable participation in pair work, group work, or whole‐class situations. Conversely, Yu's (2015) study of 58 Chinese university students found that correlation between a one‐time only, static measurement of WTC with a classroom WTC scale did predict the number of words and turns a learner took. These contradictory findings highlight an important limitation in many WTC studies, and thus understanding under what circumstances aroused WTC leads to communication is an important goal for teachers and researchers alike.…”
Section: Mind the Gapmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of correlation between observable communication and situated, moment‐to‐moment ratings of WTC reported by MacIntyre and Legatto (2011) mirrors the findings of an earlier study by Cao and Philp (2006), whereby self‐reported trait‐like measurements of eight overseas language school students’ WTC “indicated no clear correlations” (p. 485) with observable participation in pair work, group work, or whole‐class situations. Conversely, Yu's (2015) study of 58 Chinese university students found that correlation between a one‐time only, static measurement of WTC with a classroom WTC scale did predict the number of words and turns a learner took. These contradictory findings highlight an important limitation in many WTC studies, and thus understanding under what circumstances aroused WTC leads to communication is an important goal for teachers and researchers alike.…”
Section: Mind the Gapmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These findings are in agreement with those of Peng and Woodrow (2010), who found that classroom environment is a key factor in WTC, and are further supported by those of de Saint Léger and Storch (2009), who described the negative effect of competitive and threatening classrooms on learners’ WTC. Similarly, Dörnyei (2002) described the co‐construction of task‐related motivation and Yu (2015) the co‐construction of task‐related WTC between interlocutors.…”
Section: Willingness To Communicate From a Complex Dynamic Systems Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include proficiency level, anxiety, social context, confidence, affective dimensions, cognitive conditions, motivation and attitudes, gender, age and so forth (Cao & Philp, 2006;Pawlak & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, 2015). These studies project WTC not as a static but as a dynamic construct since the same person's WTC may vary and fluctuate under different conditions; this has been carefully documented and explored in other research underpinned by an ecological perspective on WTC (e.g., MacIntyre & Legatto, 2011;Mystkowska-Wiertelak & Pawlak, 2014;MacIntyre, Burns, & Jessome, 2011;Yu, 2015).…”
Section: Willingness To Communicate (Wtc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this paper will focus on state WTC rather than on trait WTC because it would be important in the case of EMI classrooms to maximize the state WTC in a short-term intervention to prevent students from losing their learning opportunities in each class where new academic content is taught. From a global perspective, although previous research has primarily focused on the WTC's stable trait dispositions in the bottom layers, many recent studies globally have focused on WTC at the state level [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]. After systematically reviewing 35 research papers on state WTC, Zhang et al [19] proposed a framework combining the situational antecedents of WTC (Figure 2).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%