2019
DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v13i03.10195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of the Determinants of the Adoption of Mobile Applications as Learning Tools for Higher Education Students

Abstract: The main purpose of the present study was to examine whether mobile applica-tions could be adopted as feasible tools for learning purposes at higher education institutions. Furthermore the study’s intention was to conduct an empirical inves-tigation into students’ perceptions towards mobile applications being introduced as learning aids. The researcher developed a conceptual model derived from the technology acceptance model in order to measure the constructs used in the study. Adopting a quantitative approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, recently the TAM model has been used to examine the factors influencing the student usage of an online learning community in a rural South African university (Chinyamurindi et al 2017), to analyse the teachers' perceptions of adopting ICT for teaching at rural secondary schools in South Africa (Chisango et al 2019), and to examine the feterminants for adopting the mobile apps as learning tools for higher education students in South Africa (Chuchu and Ndoro 2019). TAM and Theory Reason Action was used to analyse the adoption of ICT into teaching based on gender differences in Malaysia (Lim et al 2019).…”
Section: Overview Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recently the TAM model has been used to examine the factors influencing the student usage of an online learning community in a rural South African university (Chinyamurindi et al 2017), to analyse the teachers' perceptions of adopting ICT for teaching at rural secondary schools in South Africa (Chisango et al 2019), and to examine the feterminants for adopting the mobile apps as learning tools for higher education students in South Africa (Chuchu and Ndoro 2019). TAM and Theory Reason Action was used to analyse the adoption of ICT into teaching based on gender differences in Malaysia (Lim et al 2019).…”
Section: Overview Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows from the word useful, which can be defined as being capable of using something advantageously [16]. Perceived usefulness of a technology measures a user's satisfaction technology [17], [18]. A consumer's perception of how useful an app could be has a substantial influence on the consumer's attitude towards the app.…”
Section: Perceived Usefulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile app use for teaching and learning has been an area of exploration since the first smartphones became available, and there has been growing use since then [ 12 ]. With this increased use, some studies have aimed to determine the characteristics of mobile apps that best contribute to student learning [ 12 , 13 ]. The app characteristics that users identify as best-promoting self-regulated and deep learning include perceived usefulness, perceived satisfaction, and interactivity [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this increased use, some studies have aimed to determine the characteristics of mobile apps that best contribute to student learning [ 12 , 13 ]. The app characteristics that users identify as best-promoting self-regulated and deep learning include perceived usefulness, perceived satisfaction, and interactivity [ 13 , 14 ]. Although frameworks for implementing mobile technology in medical education have been proposed [ 15 ], the evaluation of mobile technology use among medical students is largely limited to surveys evaluating types of apps used and extent of use [ 16 - 19 ] and barriers and facilitators to the use of mobile devices [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%