An Examination of Sarikamiş Destination Competitiveness from the Luge Athletes’ Perspective: the relationship between tourism experience and perceived destination competitiveness

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the competitiveness of Sarıkamış destination from the perspectives of the licensed luge athletes participating in 2019 Interclub Natural Luge Turkey Championship competition. The research also intends to reveal the relationship between perceived destination competitiveness and tourism experience. Two research questions were addressed in this research. The first question was to examine to what extent the competitiveness of Sarikamis destination from the luge athletes’ perspective. The second question was to reveal the relationship between the tourism experience and perceived destination competitiveness. The Luge athletes have the opportunity to get experience in a wide range of ski centers at national or international area. Therefore, the perspectives of experienced athletes are important in determining the competitive advantage elements of Sarikamis destination. The data collection of this research is the questionnaire conducted with the luge athletes participating in the competition (n=191). The results indicated Sarikamis destination competitiveness from the luge athletes’ perspective that the highest three mean scores were “The destination’s overall favorable image in the world community, “The destination’s commitment to promoting a positive image” and this was following: “The destination’s commitment to providing a safe and secure environment. The research also revealed that the luge athletes’ perception of destination competitiveness and tourism experience in the destination do positively relate to each other. The research provided managerial implications to Sarıkamış destination managers and marketers based on the research findings. Effective image studies should be conducted in order to ensure that the Sarıkamış Cıbıltepe Ski Center can compete with other destinations internationally. In Sarıkamış Cıbıltepe Ski Center, high-quality health services should be provided against the possible injuries and accidents of the athletes.
 Key words: Destination Competitiveness, Tourism Experience, Sports Tourism, Luge Athletes, Sarıkamış.

Quality Evaluation Method of College Sports Long Jump Training Course Based on Genetic Algorithm

“…Mastering the laws of motivation and behavior and consciously guiding students' behavior are the main means to regulate the communication between teachers and students and improve the relationship between teachers and students [1][2][3]. "Behavioral science" believes that human behavior is determined by motivation, and motivation is caused by need.…”

“…is reminds us that in order to have a good long jump training course in colleges and universities, we must master the needs of students and study the laws of motivation and behavior [1,4,5]: do not simply cram for the completion of the syllabus and teaching materials, but prepare for lessons and people. Before class, we should not only understand the situation of students' skills and physical tness but also understand what students think, like, and expect from the long jump class.…”

Destination competitiveness since 2010: research themes, approaches, and agenda

“…On the demand side, particularly for tourists’ perception of destination competitiveness, representative antecedents could manifest in the forms of tourism and travel experiences (Dalakis et al , 2018; Kara and Kunt, 2020; Neto et al , 2020), reputation (Perles-Ribes et al , 2019), authenticity (García-Almeida, 2019), customer satisfaction (Chen et al , 2010), destination image and emotions (Rodrigues et al , 2020) and local host–tourist interaction (Tse and Tung, 2022). Community attitude was another antecedent from the perspective of residents (Chin et al , 2014).…”

How can destination competitiveness play an essential role in small island sports tourism development? Integrated ISM-MICMAC modelling of key factors

“…According to Table 5, the SSIM was developed by considering the one-to-one association between the thirteen identified factors. F13 Infrastructure Bausch and Unseld (2018), Kara and Kunt (2020), Kim and Jogaratnam (2015), Liu (2013), Wang (2013) Table 3.…”