1992
DOI: 10.1097/00002093-199206040-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Psychometric Properties of the Extended Scale for Dementia in Three Different Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifications of the Mattis scale included additional items to expand the range of content and the use of additional scoring options in items to increase the range of scores, leading to a range of possible scores from 0 to 250. It has demonstrated its reliability and validity in clinical populations [23,24]. The maximum scores is 250 with a minimum of 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Modifications of the Mattis scale included additional items to expand the range of content and the use of additional scoring options in items to increase the range of scores, leading to a range of possible scores from 0 to 250. It has demonstrated its reliability and validity in clinical populations [23,24]. The maximum scores is 250 with a minimum of 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sub¬ division was not based on factor analysis, which generally reveals fewer factors than the number of conventionally ac¬ cepted cognitive domains. 38 The ESD scores were arbi¬ trarily grouped for the early (201-250), moderate (101-200), and severe (0-100) levels. We did not use previously reported thresholds of the ESD37 as the thresholds were de¬ termined for AD, and this may have been inappropriate in patients with VaD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six-week test-retest reliability for the ESD was reported to be .94 (Hersch, 1979). Helmes et al (1993) reported good internal consistency for the ESD, particularly for hospital samples (Cronbach's as = .93, .95, and .64 for a mixed hospital sample, a sample of patients with Alzheimer's disease, and a sample of patients without cognitive impairment, respectively).…”
Section: Psychometric Propediesmentioning
confidence: 97%