2016
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1170546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Inmate Physical Assaults on Jail Correctional Staff: Exploring Inmate-Level and Jail-Level Conditions in the United States

Abstract: The current study examines individual-level determinants of inmate-on correctional staff assaults, particularly the demographic characteristics of inmates, and the context of structural/environmental characteristics of specific jails. Findings from a series of negative binomial regression models indicate some significant relationships, with additional analyses highlighting the nonlinear nature of the relationship between racial representation and assaults. The findings give credence to both the "lone-wolf" and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the extent that prison size is strongly and significantly associated with prison victimization, we suggest that larger prisons in particular and smaller prisons in general redouble their efforts to (a) eliminate unmonitored areas (adding cameras and shutting down areas to inmates that are more remote and unsurveilled) and (b) promote and enforce effective guardianship. More staffing will not necessarily reduce victimization (as some staff are perpetrators of victimization) unless staff are trained in best custodial practices to ensure that they are able to execute their guardianship function effectively and, to motive their implementation of these best practices, there should be zero tolerance for staff on inmate victimization (Williams & Porter, 2016). Physical and sexual victimization of inmates by staff is a violation of the law and must be rigorously prosecuted to deter such acts of harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that prison size is strongly and significantly associated with prison victimization, we suggest that larger prisons in particular and smaller prisons in general redouble their efforts to (a) eliminate unmonitored areas (adding cameras and shutting down areas to inmates that are more remote and unsurveilled) and (b) promote and enforce effective guardianship. More staffing will not necessarily reduce victimization (as some staff are perpetrators of victimization) unless staff are trained in best custodial practices to ensure that they are able to execute their guardianship function effectively and, to motive their implementation of these best practices, there should be zero tolerance for staff on inmate victimization (Williams & Porter, 2016). Physical and sexual victimization of inmates by staff is a violation of the law and must be rigorously prosecuted to deter such acts of harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have begun to shift to a more integrative approach based on general strain theory (GST) in explaining misconduct among prison inmates (e.g., Morris et al, 2012; C.-Y. Williams & Porter 2016).…”
Section: Empirical and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining an orderly environment remains one of the foremost challenges facing correctional administrators. Not surprisingly, social science researchers have shown great interest in understanding individual and structural determinants of inmate behavior (Celinska & Sung, 2014; Jiang, Fisher-Giorlando, & Mo, 2005; Morris & Worrall, 2014; Morris, Carriaga, Diamond, Piquero, & Piquero, 2012; Steiner, Butler, & Ellison, 2014; C.-Y. Williams & Porter 2016; Wooldredge, Green, & Pratt, 2001; Worrall & Morris, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%