2009
DOI: 10.3319/tao.2007.10.05.01(f3c)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Ionospheric Electron Density Profile: Data Quality Criteria and Comparisons with the IRI Model

Abstract: In this ar ti cle, we an a lyze the prop er ties of ion o spheric elec tron den sity pro fil ing re trieved from FORMOSAT-3/COS MIC ra dio occultation mea sure ments. Two pa ram e ters, namely, the gra di ent and fluc tu a tion of the top side elec tron den sity pro file, serve as in di ca tors to quan ti ta tively de scribe the data qual ity of the re trieved elec tron den sity pro file. On the ba sis of 8 month data (June 2006 -Jan u ary 2007), we find that on av er age 93% of the elec tron den sity pro file… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of factors, such as thermal noise fluctuations of the received signals, sharp gradients of the ionospheric refractive index in vertical and horizontal directions, system bias of the excess phase, inaccurate position of the satellites, and so on, may influence the accuracy and precision of the retrieved bending angle in terms of radio occultation technique, causing physically erroneous inversion results (Schreiner et al, 2007). In addition, the presence of plasma irregularities in the GPS ray path may cause significant fluctuations of the retrieved electron density profile, giving rise to large uncertainty of the estimation and impairment of the data reliability (Yang et al, 2009). In this study, we use the criteria of data quality control developed by Yang et al (2009) to remove questionable and unreliable data from original data set.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of factors, such as thermal noise fluctuations of the received signals, sharp gradients of the ionospheric refractive index in vertical and horizontal directions, system bias of the excess phase, inaccurate position of the satellites, and so on, may influence the accuracy and precision of the retrieved bending angle in terms of radio occultation technique, causing physically erroneous inversion results (Schreiner et al, 2007). In addition, the presence of plasma irregularities in the GPS ray path may cause significant fluctuations of the retrieved electron density profile, giving rise to large uncertainty of the estimation and impairment of the data reliability (Yang et al, 2009). In this study, we use the criteria of data quality control developed by Yang et al (2009) to remove questionable and unreliable data from original data set.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the presence of plasma irregularities in the GPS ray path may cause significant fluctuations of the retrieved electron density profile, giving rise to large uncertainty of the estimation and impairment of the data reliability (Yang et al, 2009). In this study, we use the criteria of data quality control developed by Yang et al (2009) to remove questionable and unreliable data from original data set. Moreover, the retrieved electron densities for the conditions of geomagnetic Kp index greater than 3 are also not included in the data analysis to limit effects from geomagnetic disturbances.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although quality control schemes have been implemented in the COSMIC Data Analysis and Archive Center (CDAAC) located at Boulder, Colorado, USA, to reject bad occultation profiles, some problematic profiles may still pass the quality control to reduce the reliability of the collected occultation data. With the use of slope (or vertical gradient) of topside electron density profile and mean deviation of electron density fluctuations, Yang et al (2009) set up the criteria of data quality control to further remove questionable electron density profiles from CDAAC data base. In this study, the peak electron densities and peak heights of the COSMIC electron density profiles that were passed through the screening of the data quality control are employed to compare with those observed by ground-based ionosondes for the period from July 2006 to February 2007.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This violates the requirement for EDP inversion producing a very unrealistic profile. In order to overcome this limitation and concentrate on good quality EDPs a selection process was applied in order to exclude those measurements where the distortion of the profiles was excessive [14]. Figure 3 demonstrates the uniform distribution of locations where electron density measurements have been recorded during one week of RO.…”
Section: Fig 2 Schematic Illustrating a Ground-based (Ionosonde) Anmentioning
confidence: 99%