1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(97)00008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of fly ash carbon and its interactions with air entraining agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
34
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1999c;. However, the low hydrogen content values reported here are consistent with other published work, where the hydrogen contents of the unburned carbon are <0.5% (dry basis) or <0.02% (daf) (Hill, et al, 1997b;Maroto-Valer, et al, 2001;1999c;. The sulfur contents of all the samples ranged from 0.01 to 3.90wt%, while the nitrogen contents varied from 1.07 to 1.77wt%.…”
Section: Proximate and Ultimate Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1999c;. However, the low hydrogen content values reported here are consistent with other published work, where the hydrogen contents of the unburned carbon are <0.5% (dry basis) or <0.02% (daf) (Hill, et al, 1997b;Maroto-Valer, et al, 2001;1999c;. The sulfur contents of all the samples ranged from 0.01 to 3.90wt%, while the nitrogen contents varied from 1.07 to 1.77wt%.…”
Section: Proximate and Ultimate Analysessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results in this report help explain the origin of apparently contradictory reports of the effects of surface oxidation in the literature on fly ash carbon [8,9,12]. It is believed that the enhanced uptake of polar compounds from the vapor phase (acetone) [9] is driven by the increased surface energy and polarity of oxidized carbon surfaces, while the decreased uptake of surfactant from solution is related not to the magnitudes of the energies but to the increased polar/dispersive ratio.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Adsorption Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In recent studies, surfactant adsorption on carbon has been identified as a key phenomenon determining the suitability of coal combustion fly ash as a concrete additive [5][6][7][8][9]. Here the carbon is a contaminant and its undesirable adsorption of surfactant from the aqueous concrete paste reduces the surfactant's ability to stabilize sub-millimeter air bubbles that help improve freeze-thaw resistance in set concrete [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Results of mini slump test performed on mixes containing cement C4 and F1 class C ash (20% replacement by weight) 57 Table C. 28 Results of mini slump test performed on mixes containing cement C4 and F2 class C ash (20% replacement by weight) 57 Table C. 29 Summary of setting time results of pastes containing cement C4 and F1 class C ash (20% replacement by weight) 57 Table C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher dosage requirement of AEAs was attributed to the following properties of unburned carbon particles in fly ash: (1) the amount; (2) the specific surface area; (3) the accessibility of the surface area; (4) the chemical nature of the surface (27,28). In general, class C fly ashes were found to have carbon with much higher specific surface areas than Class F ash does.…”
Section: A4 Incompatibility Problems Driven By Fly Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%