2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-021-00797-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Crisis Intervention Teams in Rural Jurisdictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This virtual access led to crisis situations being diffused, safety plans being initiated, and better documentation of care plans and rationales. Otherwise, the limited resources and expertise in rural settings often serve as significant hurdles to providing appropriate care for individuals with mental health issues [ 20 , 33 , 34 ]. The use of technology and the availability of virtual experts can potentially overcome multiple hurdles, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This virtual access led to crisis situations being diffused, safety plans being initiated, and better documentation of care plans and rationales. Otherwise, the limited resources and expertise in rural settings often serve as significant hurdles to providing appropriate care for individuals with mental health issues [ 20 , 33 , 34 ]. The use of technology and the availability of virtual experts can potentially overcome multiple hurdles, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since geographical boundaries, local policies, and limitation of resources can shape the delivery of care, there is a need to explore the implementation of a coresponder model in rural areas [ 3 , 4 , 20 ]. This is especially relevant in South Dakota, where more than half of the population lives in rural areas and an estimated 10% of all emergency calls involve a person who may have a mental health crisis [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other emergency response programs based on the Memphis model have been developed across the country, including Waterloo, Iowa, Portland, Oregon, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Seattle, Washington (Steadman, et al, 2000). Studies on the effectiveness of the CIT model show some positive outcomes in terms of officer satisfaction and officer perception of reduction in the use of police force (Bonfine et al, 2014; Bratina, et al, 2021; Morabito et al, 2012; Skubby et al, 2013; Watson et al, 2017). In addition, prebooking jail diversion and referrals to mental health units were more likely with CIT-trained officers (Bratina et al, 2021; Compton et al, 2014; Dewa et al, 2018; Leifman & Coffey, 2020; Watson & Compton, 2019).…”
Section: Criminalizing Mental Illnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, outcomes of CIT effectiveness on objective measures of arrests, days spent in detention, identification of mental illness at an earlier stage, serious officer injury or citizen injury, use of force, and death for persons with mental illness during an emergency interaction with police officers are mixed (Earl et al, 2015; Kane et al, 2018). Another major critique of CIT is that programs that use the model often focus on officer training, but much less emphasis is placed on building strong community partnerships and encouraging community ownership of the program, also a key element of CIT as it was originally designed (Bratina et al, 2021). This lack of emphasis on the community aspect of the program results in a bias toward police perceptions in evaluations of CIT, leaving the community voice sorely understudied, and all but lost (Winters et al, 2015).…”
Section: Criminalizing Mental Illnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation