1978
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(78)90003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exact derivation of contact resistance to planar devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Should not this condition be fulfilled, a correction factor for rc would be computed following the indication given in ref. [7]. The sheet resistance of the strip layer was a variable parameter in the 2D code and at the same time it could be directly measured by means of VdP devices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should not this condition be fulfilled, a correction factor for rc would be computed following the indication given in ref. [7]. The sheet resistance of the strip layer was a variable parameter in the 2D code and at the same time it could be directly measured by means of VdP devices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the extrapolated length ("transfer length") at zero potential the contact resistance is obtained. This method was shown to be effective by Berger [15] and Schuldt [16] for thin conducting layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TLM does not correctly include the spreading resistance caused by current crowding/spreading. [4][5][6] To include the spreading resistance, Berger added a "virtual" specific contact resistance 1 in his extended TLM (ETLM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%