An Evolutionary Portrait of the Progenitor SARS-CoV-2 and Its Dominant Offshoots in COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Global sequencing of hundreds of thousands of genomes of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2, has continued to reveal new genetic variants that are the key to unraveling its early evolutionary history and tracking its global spread over time. Here, we present the heretofore cryptic mutational history and spatiotemporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 from an analysis of thousands of high-quality genomes. We report the likely most recent common ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, reconstructed through a novel application and advancement of computational methods initially developed to infer the mutational history of tumor cells in a patient. This progenitor genome differs from genomes of the first coronaviruses sampled in China by three variants, implying that none of the earliest patients represent the index case or gave rise to all the human infections. However, multiple coronavirus infections in China and the USA harbored the progenitor genetic fingerprint in January 2020 and later, suggesting that the progenitor was spreading worldwide months before and after the first reported cases of COVID-19 in China. Mutations of the progenitor and its offshoots have produced many dominant coronavirus strains, which have spread episodically over time. Fingerprinting based on common mutations reveals that the same coronavirus lineage has dominated North America for most of the pandemic in 2020. There have been multiple replacements of predominant coronavirus strains in Europe and Asia and the continued presence of multiple high-frequency strains in Asia and North America. We have developed a continually updating dashboard of global evolution and spatiotemporal trends of SARS-CoV-2 spread (http://sars2evo.datamonkey.org/).

Timeline of SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Italy: Results from an Independent Serological Retesting

“…Evidence used to support this hypothesis comes from a comparative genomic analysis of more than 175,000 genomes, which delineated 22 distinct SARS-CoV-2 haplogroups with a broad geographic distribution within China, pointing towards an early emergence and widespread cryptic circulation of the virus well before its isolation in January 2020 [25]. Recently, Kumar et al reconstructed the mutational history of SARS-CoV-2 using a so called 'mutation order approach' (MOA) [26]. From their analysis of more than 174,000 genomes, major mutational fingerprints revealed that it is useful to identify and track the spatiotemporal evolution of novel coronavirus.…”

Waiting for the truth: is reluctance in accepting an early origin hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 delaying our understanding of viral emergence?

“…On 30 January 2020, as recommended by its Emergency Committee, the WHO declared the outbreak ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ and alerted countries to be prepared for the deployment of emergency measures such as containment, active surveillance and contact tracing. 1 However, by then, the virus had already been spreading worldwide 3 and by 27 February 2020, cases of COVID-19 had already been reported in 53 countries, prompting the WHO on 11 March to characterise the disease as a global pandemic. 1 …”

Date of introduction and epidemiologic patterns of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Mogadishu, Somalia: estimates from transmission modelling of satellite-based excess mortality data in 2020

“…SARS-CoV-2 positive routine samples from mid-December 2019 were also found in Italy 14 , France 43 and the United States 44 , suggesting the pathogen was circulating in small numbers by the end of 2019 outside of China, but resulting in excess mortality only from Spring 2020. Phylogenetic analysis 45 suggests that a progenitor of the SARS-CoV-2 variant first identified in Wuhan might have been spreading outside of China before the known beginning of the city’s outbreak.…”