1996
DOI: 10.21236/ada310305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evolutionary Perspective of Software Engineering Research Through Co-Word Analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other two journals are, as indicated by their titles, concerned with concurrent or parallel and distributed computing. Although this subspecialty is relevant to software engineering, it does not appear to be central to the discipline (see Coulter, Monarch, Konda, & Carr, 1996, for similar evidence from a co-word analysis).…”
Section: Cocitation Data Gathering and Core List Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The other two journals are, as indicated by their titles, concerned with concurrent or parallel and distributed computing. Although this subspecialty is relevant to software engineering, it does not appear to be central to the discipline (see Coulter, Monarch, Konda, & Carr, 1996, for similar evidence from a co-word analysis).…”
Section: Cocitation Data Gathering and Core List Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of classification terms, such as headings or descriptors, is an established method for structural analysis of a knowledge domain (Coulter et al, 1996;Engelsman & van Raan, 1994;Healey, Rothman, & Hoch, 1986;Hinze, 1994;McCain, 1995aMcCain, , 1995bTodorov & Winterhager, 1990). The assignment of indexing terms represents the subject analyst's view of the subject content rather than the author's view, as expressed in word and citation choice.…”
Section: Gathering Subject Profile Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The size and complexity of documents and Bboard messages were measured in terms of number of words and number of unique noun phrases. Noun phrases were counted using off-the-shelf natural language processing tools [7].…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%