1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary link between sporulation and prophage induction in the structure of a repressor:anti-repressor complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, an evolutionary link between a prophage and differentiation in B. subtilis has been described in detail. SinR, a repressor protein which regulates the master controller of sporulation, Spo0A, in B. subtilis is structurally identical to the repressor protein of a Bacillus bacteriophage in the DNA binding domain (36). Moreover, a number of B. subtilis cell wall endolysins (enzymes that mediate autolysis during sporulation) are derived from bacteriophage lytic enzymes (37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, an evolutionary link between a prophage and differentiation in B. subtilis has been described in detail. SinR, a repressor protein which regulates the master controller of sporulation, Spo0A, in B. subtilis is structurally identical to the repressor protein of a Bacillus bacteriophage in the DNA binding domain (36). Moreover, a number of B. subtilis cell wall endolysins (enzymes that mediate autolysis during sporulation) are derived from bacteriophage lytic enzymes (37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the SinR-SinR interaction and the DNA-binding domains of SinR are believed to be needed for SinR to adhere to its operators (Lewis et al 1996(Lewis et al , 1998). Thus, a simple explanation for the classic filamentous phenotype of certain sinR alleles is that the amino acid substitution mutant proteins are impaired in SinR-SinR interaction or in recognition of the slrR promoter and are therefore defective in repressing slrR (which results in overexpression of slrR), but are not defective in promoting cell chaining.…”
Section: Certain Point Mutations Of Sinr Promote Cell Chainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XRE family of transcriptional regulators constitute a large family of proteins with a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif similar to that of the CI repressor and the Cro proteins of bacteriophage (9 -11), the Bacillus subtilis SinR protein (12), and the restriction modification system control proteins such as C.PvII and C.AhdI (13,14). These proteins make specific DNA contacts through their N-terminal domains, but their DNA binding affinity is modulated by their C-terminal domains (15,16). The members of the helix-turn-helix XRE family are monomers, dimers, or tetramers in solution and bind to the DNA as homodimers or heterodimers (8,17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%