2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gao, et al [11] researched on how to find the optimal bidding strategy of a GenCO in the single-side day-ahead electricity market, based on the parametric linear programming method and with the assumption that all GenCOs in the day-ahead market pursue profit maximization. In the papers by Kumar et al [12] and Wang [13], every GenCO in the single-side market optimizes its bidding strategy by evaluating the strategy probability distributions of its rivals with the information about their cost functions (complete information) and their strategies from last game iteration (but imperfect information). The dynamic evolution process of GenCOs' bidding strategy was simulated by shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) [12] and genetic algorithm (GA) [13], respectively.…”
Section: Literature Review and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gao, et al [11] researched on how to find the optimal bidding strategy of a GenCO in the single-side day-ahead electricity market, based on the parametric linear programming method and with the assumption that all GenCOs in the day-ahead market pursue profit maximization. In the papers by Kumar et al [12] and Wang [13], every GenCO in the single-side market optimizes its bidding strategy by evaluating the strategy probability distributions of its rivals with the information about their cost functions (complete information) and their strategies from last game iteration (but imperfect information). The dynamic evolution process of GenCOs' bidding strategy was simulated by shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) [12] and genetic algorithm (GA) [13], respectively.…”
Section: Literature Review and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the papers by Kumar et al [12] and Wang [13], every GenCO in the single-side market optimizes its bidding strategy by evaluating the strategy probability distributions of its rivals with the information about their cost functions (complete information) and their strategies from last game iteration (but imperfect information). The dynamic evolution process of GenCOs' bidding strategy was simulated by shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) [12] and genetic algorithm (GA) [13], respectively. Liu et al [14] reported an incentive bidding mechanism in which the semi-randomized approach is applied to model the information disturbance in the electricity auction markets.…”
Section: Literature Review and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional bidding models may possibly fail to reflect the process during which bidders observed and learned from other bidders; however, evolutionary game-based models have potential in dynamically and retrospectively simulating bidding strategies [65]. On this account, an imperfect information evolutionary game is developed to discuss bidding strategies in the electricity market with price elastic demands [66]. In recent years, the theory has begun to be applied in an international climate change negotiation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission mitigation burden sharing [67][68][69].…”
Section: Literature Review On Resource Allocation Under Incomplete Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross and Finlay adopted a Lagrangian relaxation-based approach for strategic bidding in the England-Wales pool-type electricity market [3]. Jainhui et al [4] used an evolutionary * Correspondence: jvkeee@gmail.com game approach to analyze the bidding strategies by considering the elastic demand. Ebrahim and Galiana developed a Nash equilibrium-based bidding strategy in electricity markets [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%