2003
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary explanation of the aggregation model of species coexistence

Abstract: In ecology, the 'aggregation model of coexistence' provides a powerful concept to explain the unexpectedly high species richness of insects on ephemeral resources like dung pats, fruits, etc. It suggests that females aggregate their eggs across resource patches, which leads to an increased intraspecific competition within occupied patches and a relatively large number of patches that remain unoccupied. This provides competitor-free patches for heterospecifics, facilitating species coexistence. At first glance,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for a trained fly, increasing social interactions would increase information transfer but decrease its own information level. Transferring information about oviposition sites could be adaptive for a trained fly, as larval survival depends on a balance between resource exploitation and larval competition [29][30][31]. When few larvae feed on a natural resource such as decaying fruit, they cannot optimally exploit the medium, and thus fail to challenge the development of bacterial and fungal competitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a trained fly, increasing social interactions would increase information transfer but decrease its own information level. Transferring information about oviposition sites could be adaptive for a trained fly, as larval survival depends on a balance between resource exploitation and larval competition [29][30][31]. When few larvae feed on a natural resource such as decaying fruit, they cannot optimally exploit the medium, and thus fail to challenge the development of bacterial and fungal competitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally designed for modelling the unexpectedly high species richness of female insects laying their eggs on ephemeral resources (e.g. animal dung, fruit), the aggregation model of coexistence holds that spatially clumped individuals, such as those in edge habitat bordered by matrix (non-habitat), that exploit ephemeral resources, such as seasonally available insects and fruit, may have limited population growth [Rohlfs and Hoffmeister, 2003]. The result of this novel pattern of population dynamics is that there should be unexploited resources available to a competitively inferior species or individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can imagine some benefits from being in a small group, including suppressing mould, enhancing the growth of preferred species of yeast and bacteria, and improved ability to dig into the substrate [45][46][47][48][49]. Such benefits, however, may not be important in our laboratory settings, where we provide larvae with a diet containing yeast and a mould inhibitor.…”
Section: (C) Benefits and Costs Of Joining Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%