An Evolutionary Argument for a Self-Explanatory, Benevolent Metaphysics

Abstract

In this paper, a metaphysics is proposed that includes everything that can be represented by a well-founded multiset. It is shown that this metaphysics, apart from being self-explanatory, is also benevolent. Paradoxically, it turns out that the probability that we were born in another life than our own is zero. More insights are gained by inducing properties from a metaphysics that is not self-explanatory. In particular, digital metaphysics is analyzed, which claims that only computable things exist. First of all, it is shown that digital metaphysics contradicts itself by leading to the conclusion that the shortest computer program that computes the world is infinitely long. This means that the Church-Turing conjecture must be false. Secondly, the applicability of Occam's razor is explained by evolution: in an evolving physics it can appear at each moment as if the world is caused by only finitely many things. Thirdly and most importantly, this metaphysics is benevolent in the sense that it organizes itself to fulfill the deepest wishes of its observers. Fourthly, universal computers with an infinite memory capacity cannot be built in the world. And finally, all the properties of the world, both good and bad, can be explained by evolutionary conservation.

EVAAN: An empirical verification argument against naturalism

“…Furthermore, metaphysical beliefs are beliefs about the existence or non-existence of certain classes of logically possible, non-natural (or supernatural) entities. Blondé's (2015Blondé's ( , 2016Blondé's ( , 2019 and Blondé and Jansen's (2021) accounts of supernaturalism will be taken as leading examples. 3 Their supernaturalists can make the claim that naturalists are supernaturally predestined to believe in N. In response to this claim, naturalists should be able to prove N. The belief in N often goes together with the belief in E. As a part of the main argument in this paper, I show that, if N&E is true, evolutionary naturalists are empiricists about the ontology of reality by their own nature: methodologies that prove premisses that are not empirically verifiable are rejected.…”

“…These four theories are inspired by Blondé's (2015Blondé's ( , 2016Blondé's ( , 2019 and Blondé and Jansen's (2021) accounts of supernaturalism, which jointly make the following claims:…”