2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24688-6_142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evolutionary Approach to Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows

Abstract: Abstract.Recently, the quality and the diversity of transport services are more and more required. Moreover, in case of a great deal of services and selling goods, a significant part of price is transport cost. Thus, the design of models and applications which make possible efficient transport planning and scheduling becomes important. A great deal of real transport problems may be modelled by using Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows (PDPTW) and capacity constraints, which is based on the realizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, pruning redundancy directly omits unnecessary supply: Instances with large gain values can therefore reach the lower bound of vehicle capacity. The result on n300mosA(277) with γ = 1000 clearly shows that the proposed MOMA achieves the lowest vehicle capacity, while the other nondominated solution provides an alternative 0.958697 [11,634] 0.978473 [101,4414] 0.980050 [1001,42214] n100mosB (92) [3453. 28, 92098.40] 0.956819 [11,708] 0.980140 [101,4938] 0.980820 [1001,47238] n200mosA(181) [5103.02, 184604.00] 0.954380 [11,1400] 0.985135 [101,9860] 0.987543 [1001,94460] n200mosB(184) [5349.50, 187739.00] 0.950454 [11,1371] 0.983216 [101,9291] 0.946123 [11,2131] 0.986288 [101,14821] 0.989920 [1001,141721] n300mosB(279) [6241.38, 286744.00] 0.946382 [11,2123] 0.986773 [101,14543] 0.990090 [1001,138743] n400mosA(358) [7608.35, 373033.00] 0.937040 [11,2678] 0.986653 [101,18158] 0.991664 [1001,172958] n400mosB(364) [7116.25, 372793.00] 0.936453 [13,2792] 0.985734 [101,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, pruning redundancy directly omits unnecessary supply: Instances with large gain values can therefore reach the lower bound of vehicle capacity. The result on n300mosA(277) with γ = 1000 clearly shows that the proposed MOMA achieves the lowest vehicle capacity, while the other nondominated solution provides an alternative 0.958697 [11,634] 0.978473 [101,4414] 0.980050 [1001,42214] n100mosB (92) [3453. 28, 92098.40] 0.956819 [11,708] 0.980140 [101,4938] 0.980820 [1001,47238] n200mosA(181) [5103.02, 184604.00] 0.954380 [11,1400] 0.985135 [101,9860] 0.987543 [1001,94460] n200mosB(184) [5349.50, 187739.00] 0.950454 [11,1371] 0.983216 [101,9291] 0.946123 [11,2131] 0.986288 [101,14821] 0.989920 [1001,141721] n300mosB(279) [6241.38, 286744.00] 0.946382 [11,2123] 0.986773 [101,14543] 0.990090 [1001,138743] n400mosA(358) [7608.35, 373033.00] 0.937040 [11,2678] 0.986653 [101,18158] 0.991664 [1001,172958] n400mosB(364) [7116.25, 372793.00] 0.936453 [13,2792] 0.985734 [101,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…28, 92098.40] 0.956819 [11,708] 0.980140 [101,4938] 0.980820 [1001,47238] n200mosA(181) [5103.02, 184604.00] 0.954380 [11,1400] 0.985135 [101,9860] 0.987543 [1001,94460] n200mosB(184) [5349.50, 187739.00] 0.950454 [11,1371] 0.983216 [101,9291] 0.946123 [11,2131] 0.986288 [101,14821] 0.989920 [1001,141721] n300mosB(279) [6241.38, 286744.00] 0.946382 [11,2123] 0.986773 [101,14543] 0.990090 [1001,138743] n400mosA(358) [7608.35, 373033.00] 0.937040 [11,2678] 0.986653 [101,18158] 0.991664 [1001,172958] n400mosB(364) [7116.25, 372793.00] 0.936453 [13,2792] 0.985734 [101,19262] 0.991015 [1001,183962] n500mosA(453) [7782.54, 471843.00] 0.929813 [11,3538] 0.984752 [101,24418] 0.992336 [1001,233218] n500mosB (454) [8066. 16, 469276.00]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of approximation algorithms for the multiple vehicle case are the evolutionary approach of [2] and the grouping genetic algorithm of [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%