2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(03)00114-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary approach reveals a high protein-coding capacity of the human genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a large proportion of novel noncoding mouse transcripts (Okazaki et al 2002) and nongenic conserved blocks between mouse and human (Dermitzakis et al 2002) have been identified supporting these conclusions. Nevertheless, Nekrutenko et al (2003) identified a large population (14,000) of potential protein-coding exons using an evolutionary comparative genomics approach between mouse and human, with 111 of those on Chromosome 22, and found 89 (∼80%) are expressed in our transcription data (Nekrutenko et al 2003). Additional evolutionary sequence comparisons of the expressed transfrag regions to the genomes of species closer to human are in progress and may indicate a greater degree of conservation.…”
Section: Transcriptome Of Chromosomes 21 and 22mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a large proportion of novel noncoding mouse transcripts (Okazaki et al 2002) and nongenic conserved blocks between mouse and human (Dermitzakis et al 2002) have been identified supporting these conclusions. Nevertheless, Nekrutenko et al (2003) identified a large population (14,000) of potential protein-coding exons using an evolutionary comparative genomics approach between mouse and human, with 111 of those on Chromosome 22, and found 89 (∼80%) are expressed in our transcription data (Nekrutenko et al 2003). Additional evolutionary sequence comparisons of the expressed transfrag regions to the genomes of species closer to human are in progress and may indicate a greater degree of conservation.…”
Section: Transcriptome Of Chromosomes 21 and 22mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although 30,000 to 40,000 is presently the most favorable estimate, emerging data based on a variety of computational and experimental approaches indicate that these estimates need to be re-evaluated (Chen et al 2002;Okazaki et al 2002;Saha et al 2002;Guigo et al 2003;Nekrutenko et al 2003;Rinn et al 2003). We recently reported the results of an unbiased analysis of human Chromosomes 21 and 22 that systematically interrogated the entire nonrepetitive regions of these chromosomes for the location of transcription using high-density oligonucleotide arrays (Fodor et al 1991(Fodor et al , 1993Pease et al 1994;Kapranov et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak conservation of transcription factor-binding sites and regulatory networks in mammalian genomes would actually fit with the fact that TE sequence and distribution are highly diverse among species. As a global illustration of the effect of TEs on genic composition and regulation, it was estimated that TE-derived sequences are found in the coding region of 4% of human genes, and are contained in 25% of human promoters (Nekrutenko et al, 2003;van de Lagemaat et al, 2003). TE activity can also indirectly generate beneficial novelties, by hijacking cellular mRNAs and catalyzing the insertion of their complementary DNA in new genomic environments.…”
Section: Good Tes Bad Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any event, 99 % of mouse genes have a human homolog and 96 % are true orthologs as they occur on corresponding chromosome loci. Consequently, at most 1200 (4 %), but possibly as little as 300 (1 %), of human genes have arisen de novo since the rodent and primate lineages split from a com-1 Other studies claim, that perhaps as much as half of the 65,000-75,000 transcriptional units had been previously missed (Wright et al, 2001;Nekrutenko et al, 2003;Rinn et al, 2003), or that the genome contains at least 42,000 genes (Hogenesch et al, 2001). Other estimates, however, suggest that the gene number is less than 25,000 (Pennisi, 2003).…”
Section: Copyright © 2005 S Karger Ag Baselmentioning
confidence: 99%