Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600)
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2002.1004402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evolutionary algorithm for constrained multi-objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we apply a wrapper feature selection mechanism via the adaptation of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm known as ENORA [9], [10], and we compare its performance against the classical multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II [11] along two directives: (i) performance of the multi-objective search strategy via measuring the hypervolume, and (ii) quality of the classifiers that have been built over the selected features. The goal is to build a classifier for the session data of a multi-skill contact center, which allows us to predict the outcome of a communication based on a limited set of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we apply a wrapper feature selection mechanism via the adaptation of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm known as ENORA [9], [10], and we compare its performance against the classical multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II [11] along two directives: (i) performance of the multi-objective search strategy via measuring the hypervolume, and (ii) quality of the classifiers that have been built over the selected features. The goal is to build a classifier for the session data of a multi-skill contact center, which allows us to predict the outcome of a communication based on a limited set of features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in described above approach there are no mechanisms responsible for respecting constraints defined in MOOP. Meanwhile in almost all real-life problems constraints are a crucial part of MOOP definition and it is nothing strange that among (evolutionary) algorithms for multi-objective optimization special attention is drown to techniques and algorithms for constrained multi-objective optimization and a varietymore or less effective-algorithms have been proposed (it is enough to mention here Jimenez-Verdegay-GomezSkarmeta's method [6], constrained tournament method or Ray-Tai-Seow's method [9]) 1 . In the course of this paper the idea as well as preliminary results of Constrained Evolutionary Multi-Agent System (conEMAS) for Multi-objective Optimization are presented.…”
Section: Evolutionary Multi-agent Systems In (Constrained) Multi-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, one could use a more Pareto set like method whereby a population of valid networks is evolved and then those networks are explored for novelty via an altering objective function such as VEGA [19] or some kind of Pareto-reckoning approach such as SPEA [14]. In particular, if valid networks are clustered, one could evolve valid networks via a method of "niched-selection" [20].…”
Section: Weighting Of the Fitness Functions And Alternative Multi-objmentioning
confidence: 99%