1992
DOI: 10.1109/21.148430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evidential reasoning extension to quantitative model-based failure diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) No other elements belong to , D Θ except those obtained by using Rules (1) or (2). D Θ (the cardinality of D Θ ) is majored by 2 2 n when .…”
Section: Modeling Of Simultaneous Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) No other elements belong to , D Θ except those obtained by using Rules (1) or (2). D Θ (the cardinality of D Θ ) is majored by 2 2 n when .…”
Section: Modeling Of Simultaneous Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research results show that the DST-based fault diagnosis methods are efficient for fault diagnosis [2,3] . However, these methods are primarily used to solve single fault diagnosis problems, little applied to the diagnosis of simultaneous faults, which often occur in practical equipments (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are even some software packages based upon this approach [227]. Abduction is known to be successful in diagnostics [228,229]. There are papers that try to develop a theory of circumstantial evidence to justify abduction [230].…”
Section: Nonmonotonic Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing DST-based fault diagnosis method is mainly used to deal with single fault diagnosis problem [3][4][5], since simultaneous faults cannot be characterized in DST due to the fundamental assumption of "mutually exclusive". But simultaneous faults (e.g., rotor unbalance and misalignment faults occur simultaneously) often occur in practice, especially in large and complex equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%