2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An event-based perspective on the development of commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research suggests even then, employee commitment tends to rebound somewhat after such shocks (Allen, Freeman, Russell, Reizenstein, & Rentz, ; Roe et al, ). AC could also increase more slowly over time as a result of a “creep” process whereby a slow accumulation of minor negative events tempers the rise in one's commitment level (Bergman, Benzer, Kabins, Bhupatkar, & Panina, ). However, due to positive social adjustments and dissonance reduction, the “creep” processes, while not a surefire one‐way ratchet towards higher commitment, should tend to build AC more than its erosion, especially given the generally durable and resilient nature of evaluative affective attachments (Solinger et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research suggests even then, employee commitment tends to rebound somewhat after such shocks (Allen, Freeman, Russell, Reizenstein, & Rentz, ; Roe et al, ). AC could also increase more slowly over time as a result of a “creep” process whereby a slow accumulation of minor negative events tempers the rise in one's commitment level (Bergman, Benzer, Kabins, Bhupatkar, & Panina, ). However, due to positive social adjustments and dissonance reduction, the “creep” processes, while not a surefire one‐way ratchet towards higher commitment, should tend to build AC more than its erosion, especially given the generally durable and resilient nature of evaluative affective attachments (Solinger et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the causes of workplace commitments have so far focused on either antecedents of commitment or bases of commitment, rather than the development of commitment (Bergman et al, 2013). Organisational commitment is not eternal nor an unchanging employee phenomenon (Beck & Wilson, 2001) and from that perspective, it is important to understand the mind mechanisms that affect the process of change.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Organisational Commitment and Non-fammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisational commitment is not eternal nor an unchanging employee phenomenon (Beck & Wilson, 2001) and from that perspective, it is important to understand the mind mechanisms that affect the process of change. Events like organisational change have directly impacted employee commitment (Bergman et al, 2013) and FBS should be viewed more as an organisational change (Ip & Jacobs, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Background Organisational Commitment and Non-fammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that recent theory discusses commitment as a dynamic phenomenon, it should be studied with longitudinal designs where change in commitment is focus of prediction. In fact, prior reviews have shown that many unanswered questions remain with regard to predicting change in commitment (e.g., Bergman, Benzer, Kabins, Bhupatkar, & Panina, ; Morrow, ). Newcomer socialization is an especially interesting setting for predicting change in affective organizational commitment (AOC).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%