2009
DOI: 10.1145/1631162.1631164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionary behavior of interaction graphs

Abstract: Interaction graphs are ubiquitous in many fields such as bioinformatics, sociology and physical sciences. There have been many studies in the literature targeted at studying and mining these graphs. However, almost all of them have studied these graphs from a static point of view. The study of the evolution of these graphs over time can provide tremendous insight on the behavior of entities, communities and the flow of information among them. In this work, we present an eventbased characterization of critical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
167
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
167
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to quantify whether the community decomposition of the graph observed at the beginning remains stable over time or evolves towards a different partition at the end. Other research has generally agreed on the main types of event that may occur as communities change over time [43][44][45][46]. We take the definitions of Asur et al [43] and denoting the set of nodes making up community C k in snapshot i by C • κ-Split: C k i has been split in snapshot i+1 if κ% of nodes in C k i are present in different communities in snapshot i + 1.…”
Section: Community Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to quantify whether the community decomposition of the graph observed at the beginning remains stable over time or evolves towards a different partition at the end. Other research has generally agreed on the main types of event that may occur as communities change over time [43][44][45][46]. We take the definitions of Asur et al [43] and denoting the set of nodes making up community C k in snapshot i by C • κ-Split: C k i has been split in snapshot i+1 if κ% of nodes in C k i are present in different communities in snapshot i + 1.…”
Section: Community Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the definitions of Asur et al [43] and denoting the set of nodes making up community C k in snapshot i by C • κ-Split: C k i has been split in snapshot i+1 if κ% of nodes in C k i are present in different communities in snapshot i + 1. For Split and Merge we take κ = 50 as in [43].…”
Section: Community Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the framework of evolutionary clustering, Chi et al (2007); Lin et al (2009a); Bron and Kerbosch (2009) propose novel instantiated evolutionary solutions for clustering dynamic networks. Many other works (Sun et al 2007;Asur et al 2007;Yang et al 2009;Greene et al 2010;Tantipathananandh et al 2007;Duan et al 2009) study the evolutionary process of clusters in dynamic social network. Recently, the community evolution problem is studied (Lin et al 2009b;Tang et al 2008;Sun et al 2010) on heterogenous networks, in which there are more than one types of entities and relationships.…”
Section: Dynamic Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palla et al [17] and Greene et al [18] developed models for tracking the evolution process of communities for dynamic networks, where each community is characterized by a series of significant evolutionary events, including growth, contraction, merging, splitting, birth and death. Asur et al [19] developed a framework for capturing and identifying community events which are used to characterize complex behavioral patterns of individuals and communities over time. Gauvin et al [20] used the non-negative tensor factorization method to extract the community activities of dynamic networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%