2022
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An event‐based analysis of maternal physiological reactivity following aversive child behaviors

Abstract: Research investigating the association between parents' physiological reactivity and their ability to self‐regulate in parenting contexts typically examines the average physiological response across the duration of a dyadic task, conflating reactivity across a multitude of parent and child behaviors. The present study utilized a moving‐window analytical technique to generate a continuous, second × second time series of mothers' high‐frequency heart rate variability (HF‐HRV) to conduct an event‐based analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Power estimates were obtained within the adult respiration frequency band (0.12–0.40 Hz; Berntson, Quigley, & Lozano, 2007 ) for caregiver participants and within age-appropriate frequency bands for child participants (Shader et al, 2018 ). In short, the combination of PM MW and STFT produces point estimates of time-varying RSA for the central second in every rolling 32-s window, while drawing on information from the 16 s before and after the central second (Gates et al, 2015 ); notably, this focal tapering method has been shown to capture changes in RSA without requiring first-differencing (Gatzke-Kopp et al, 2022 ). The PM MW/STFT method has been validated among adult and caregiver-child dyads (Gatzke-Kopp et al, 2022 ; Somers et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power estimates were obtained within the adult respiration frequency band (0.12–0.40 Hz; Berntson, Quigley, & Lozano, 2007 ) for caregiver participants and within age-appropriate frequency bands for child participants (Shader et al, 2018 ). In short, the combination of PM MW and STFT produces point estimates of time-varying RSA for the central second in every rolling 32-s window, while drawing on information from the 16 s before and after the central second (Gates et al, 2015 ); notably, this focal tapering method has been shown to capture changes in RSA without requiring first-differencing (Gatzke-Kopp et al, 2022 ). The PM MW/STFT method has been validated among adult and caregiver-child dyads (Gatzke-Kopp et al, 2022 ; Somers et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%