2014
DOI: 10.1080/00221341.2013.872692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of University World Geography Textbook Questions for Components of Spatial Thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we are based on the methodology developed and applied by Jo and Bednarz (2009) and replicated by Scholz, Brysch, Huynh, Scholz (2014). This methodology is the only known theoretical effort to measure, with a solid scientific foundation, the required level of spatial thinking present in the questions and activities of geography textbooks.…”
Section: Methodology Uses To Analyze Questions and Activities Found Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we are based on the methodology developed and applied by Jo and Bednarz (2009) and replicated by Scholz, Brysch, Huynh, Scholz (2014). This methodology is the only known theoretical effort to measure, with a solid scientific foundation, the required level of spatial thinking present in the questions and activities of geography textbooks.…”
Section: Methodology Uses To Analyze Questions and Activities Found Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is good to reaffirm that the data presented, both those of our surveys and those obtained from the North American research's, are the result of the classification carried out only with the questions that effectively involve spatial thinking. The data of the American books presented in chart 2 were taken from the research's conducted by Jo and Bednarz (2009) and Scholz et al (2014).…”
Section: Chart 1 -Percentage Of Questions Demanding Spatial Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested a simplified taxonomy for evaluating materials, integrating all three components. Scholz et al, 2014) This section has not attempted to comprehensively review spatial-thinking research, but to examine how its evolution has been rooted in many different domains, as widespread as neuroscience, psychology and geography. From this it is clear that spatial thinking involves highly complex cognitive activities.…”
Section: Dimensions Modes and Framework Of Spatial Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They make the case that a spatial thinking taxonomy is a useful tool for designing and selecting questions that integrate the three components of spatial thinking, and for determining the degree of complexity of a question with regards to its use of spatial concepts and the cognitive processes required. Scholz et al (2014) used JO et al's (2010 system to identify the level and type of spatial thinking found in textbook questions (Table 4). They suggested a simplified taxonomy for evaluating materials, integrating all three components.…”
Section: Dimensions Modes and Framework Of Spatial Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como parámetro de comparación, se realizó el mismo procedimiento con una colección de materiales didácticos franceses destinados a la misma franja de escolaridad. Para realizar la evaluación de esas actividades se utilizó la Taxonomía del Pensamiento Espacial de Jo y Bednarz (2009), creada exactamente para esa finalidad y replicada por Scholz et al (2014). El levantamiento identificó no solo la proporción de cuestiones demandantes del pensamiento espacial, sino también el nivel de los procesos de raciocinio involucrados y el tipo de representación espacial utilizado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified