2022
DOI: 10.1097/nnd.0000000000000909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Traditional Versus Virtual Nurse Residency Programs on New Graduate Nurses’ Perceptions of Preparedness to Provide Safe Patient Care

Abstract: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurse residents’ perceptions of preparedness while learning in a virtual environment remains unknown. This cohort study compared nurse residents’ perceptions of preparedness in traditional in-person versus virtual learning environments. Results found no statistically significant differences between these two groups over 1 year. This demonstrates that a virtual learning format can achieve comparable outcomes to a traditional in-person learning format in successfully transi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content validity was reported previously for both surveys ( Casey & Fink, 2015 ; Fink et al, 2008 ; Healy et al, 2022 ). We conducted an internal consistency reliability analysis for the survey measures using baseline (0 months) data in the studied sample and found acceptable Cronbach alpha scores across all multi-item scales: support (.826), patient safety (.734), communication/leadership (.755), professional satisfaction (.768), job satisfaction (.849), collaboration (.727), leadership (.965), commitment (.926), and advocacy (.951).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Content validity was reported previously for both surveys ( Casey & Fink, 2015 ; Fink et al, 2008 ; Healy et al, 2022 ). We conducted an internal consistency reliability analysis for the survey measures using baseline (0 months) data in the studied sample and found acceptable Cronbach alpha scores across all multi-item scales: support (.826), patient safety (.734), communication/leadership (.755), professional satisfaction (.768), job satisfaction (.849), collaboration (.727), leadership (.965), commitment (.926), and advocacy (.951).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The outcome measures included the following scales from the Casey-Fink Graduate Nurse Experience Survey ( Casey & Fink, 2015 ; Fink et al, 2008 ; Healy et al, 2022 ): support (9 items; e.g., “I feel supported by the nurses on my unit”), patient safety (5 items; e.g., “I feel I may harm the patient due to my lack of knowledge and experience”), overall stress (1 item: “I am experiencing stress in my personal life”), communication/leadership (6 items; e.g., “I feel comfortable communicating with patients and their families”), professional satisfaction (3 items; e.g., “I am satisfied with my chosen nursing specialty”), and job satisfaction (9 items; e.g., “Satisfaction with work responsibilities”). Outcome measures also included the following scales from the Nurse Resident Progression Survey that were used in prior research ( Healy et al, 2022 ): advocacy (18 items), collaboration (6 items), leadership (13 items), and commitment (14 items). Total scores were divided by the number of questions, resulting in a score that corresponded closely to the Likert scale used for the survey questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations