2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1480-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of three processing methods and the effect of reduced culture times for faster direct identification of pathogens from BacT/ALERT blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS

Abstract: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a fast and reliable method for the identification of bacteria from agar media. Direct identification from positive blood cultures should decrease the time to obtaining the result. In this study, three different processing methods for the rapid direct identification of bacteria from positive blood culture bottles were compared. In total, 101 positive aerobe BacT/ALERT bottles were included in this study. Aliquots from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This compares favorably with data from others using in-house extraction systems for blood culture analysis which have reported correct identification rates ranging from 67 to 100%, with higher success rates for Gram-negative organisms than for Gram-positive organisms (11)(12)(13)(15)(16)(17). Similarly, a recent study by Buchan et al, also using the Sepsityper system, reported that 85.5% of the blood culture isolates tested were identified directly from blood cultures with better performance for Gram-negative organisms (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This compares favorably with data from others using in-house extraction systems for blood culture analysis which have reported correct identification rates ranging from 67 to 100%, with higher success rates for Gram-negative organisms than for Gram-positive organisms (11)(12)(13)(15)(16)(17). Similarly, a recent study by Buchan et al, also using the Sepsityper system, reported that 85.5% of the blood culture isolates tested were identified directly from blood cultures with better performance for Gram-negative organisms (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In staphylococci, rates of correct identification were low (9/35; 25.7%), while for Enterobacteriaceae, the rates were 100% (20/20). This is in accordance with the findings of other groups that used Sepsityper, who found significantly lower identification rates for Gram-positive (42.3-78%) compared to Gram- [16,17]. Direct MS from BCs, regardless of the manufacturer, is labor-intensive and does not replace bacterial culture preparation, since this is still required in order to perform susceptibility tests and exclude bacterial mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…21 Despite this, MALDI-TOF MS analysis can reduce manual workload for medical scientists and improve throughput of laboratory samples. 22 Exemplifying this, previously technically-challenging identification of microorganisms from sputum of cystic fibrosis patients, 8 utilizing multiple selective media and prolonged incubation, may now be completed within 48 hours of sampling. 23 More specifically, a 2012 Canadian study 24 reported a mean reduction in turnaround time of 34.3 hours when definitive identification of isolates directly from blood samples was possible, albeit that this reduction was lower, but still clinically important, at 26.5 hours when incubation was necessary before MALDI-TOF MS could be utilized.…”
Section: Can Laboratory Results Be Expedited?mentioning
confidence: 99%