2017
DOI: 10.21275/art20164039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Scans of the Time-Dependent Volume Changes in Bone Grafting Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometry, ultrastructure, and mechanical properties of these BSBs, in addition to their chemical composition, are critical for effective bone defect repair, resorption, and concomitant replacement with newly formed bone [ 101 ]. Studies by Khaled et al [ 102 ] and Georgiev et al [ 103 ] combining injectable BSB with HA nanoparticles found that HA in the form of smaller granules promoted better cell contact, leading to faster biomaterial resorption and new bone formation. This was also confirmed in this study, in which BSB was used with the addition of HA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry, ultrastructure, and mechanical properties of these BSBs, in addition to their chemical composition, are critical for effective bone defect repair, resorption, and concomitant replacement with newly formed bone [ 101 ]. Studies by Khaled et al [ 102 ] and Georgiev et al [ 103 ] combining injectable BSB with HA nanoparticles found that HA in the form of smaller granules promoted better cell contact, leading to faster biomaterial resorption and new bone formation. This was also confirmed in this study, in which BSB was used with the addition of HA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GBR with simultaneous implant placement and ISBG in a combination with pericardium collagen membrane showed complete bone defect regeneration, long-lasting volume stability and soft tissue aesthetics in patients that were monitored for 2-5 years [24]. Even though ISBG showed higher volumetric loss than bovine xenografts in maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures after three years follow up, there was no significant difference in new bone formation between 6th and 9th month [25,33]. Here the mean percentage of new bone was 15% and 21%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the addition of a third synthetic phase (HA nanoparticles in a waterbased gel) seems to promote higher volumetric bone loss after three years, it still enables complete recovery of the bone defects and excellent volume stability over time [24,25]. This injectable synthetic bone graft (ISBG) (60% HA/40% ß-TCP granules and HA nanoparticles within water-based gel) can also build a barrier-like structure that is able to control soft tissue infiltration into the implanted bed [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%