2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the usefulness of two terminology models for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED Clinical Terms®

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1990s, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT)’s decided to include nursing terms, to account for the differences between the professions [45,46]. Evaluation of the nursing concepts in SNOMED continued for another decade [47,48]. Later research has evaluated the differences between nursing concepts within SNOMED-CT [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990s, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT)’s decided to include nursing terms, to account for the differences between the professions [45,46]. Evaluation of the nursing concepts in SNOMED continued for another decade [47,48]. Later research has evaluated the differences between nursing concepts within SNOMED-CT [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also considered the representation of and mapping to semantic links for nursing diagnostic statements [10,11].…”
Section: Semantic Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have examined the level of conformance of nursing terminologies to the ISO standard by decomposing or dissecting individual terms, and mapping these dissections to the standard [9][10][11][12]. This study goes further than these previous studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANA-recognized, standardized nursing languages provide the comprehensive content for the 3 nursing clinical elements of the NMDS: the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Classification (NANDA, 2001), 45 the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), 46 the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), [47][48][49][50] the Omaha System, 51 the Home Health Care Classification, 52 the Patient Care Data Set (PCDS), 53 the Perioperative Nursing Data Elements, 54 SnomedRT, 55 and the International Classification of Nursing Practice. 56,57 The Nursing Management Minimum Data Set (NMMDS), recognized by ANA in 1998, complements the NMDS by identifying contextual and structural factors that can affect quality.…”
Section: Nursing Classifications and Uniform Nursing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, nursing diagnosis terms in different uniform languages can be mapped through reference terms to one another, as can the labels for interventions and outcomes from different uniform languages. 55,66 Testing of the use of the reference models and mapping will be needed to ensure that synonymy of terms is reliably achieved and maintained and that meaningful data are available for analysis. Plans for this testing or how it will be accomplished are not clear at this time.…”
Section: Maas and Delaneymentioning
confidence: 99%