2010
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2010.2042281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Use of Atmospheric and BRDF Correction to Standardize Landsat Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve topographic normalization, the sloping reflectance derived from the sensor must be converted to a flat reflectance based on atmospheric and topographic correction, as expressed in Equation (8).There are two main methods for validating the merit of the topographic correction: visual inspection and quantitative accuracy analysis. Figure 5 shows the result of the partially enlarged images for a clear visual interpretation of the topographic normalization.…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve topographic normalization, the sloping reflectance derived from the sensor must be converted to a flat reflectance based on atmospheric and topographic correction, as expressed in Equation (8).There are two main methods for validating the merit of the topographic correction: visual inspection and quantitative accuracy analysis. Figure 5 shows the result of the partially enlarged images for a clear visual interpretation of the topographic normalization.…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, four actual angles on tiled surfaces must be changed in the new coordinate system based on the DEM, which can be calculated according to the literature [5]. Considering the small variation in the Landsat sensor view angle, the observed zenith and azimuth are assumed to be zero for each pixel [8]. The calculations for the actual observed zenith and azimuth angles on a given inclined surface can be simplified as:…”
Section: Improved Topographic Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another method is land-type-based (LB) BRDF fitting using aerial images, which are commonly acquired by an optical scanner with a wide field of view and one observation geometry per pixel, such as the airborne HYMAP [8] and airborne compact airborne spectrographic imager (CASI) [20,21]. The BRDF's shape [22], generally extracted from the relatively homogeneous pixels of MODIS or POLDER BRDF product, is required in LB BRDF fitting as prior knowledge of one land type [23,24]. Thus, the fitting performance of airborne BRDF is limited by the quality of the prior knowledge, as well as its spatiotemporal scale discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, BRDF effects cannot be directly derived from Landsat data due to the small variation in illumination and viewing angles and infrequent revisits of the sensor (Li et al, 2010). Other sensors with similar or higher spatial resolutions than the 30m provided by Landsat also typically have small variations in angular sampling and infrequent revisits limit their ability to derive BRDF effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%