2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-007-9076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the UK’s anti-money laundering and asset recovery regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The money that is taken away from offenders should at least have some impact on them. Further research should focus on the effects of different sanctions and measures (see also Collins and King, 2013; House of Commons, 2014: 11; Sproat, 2007: 183–4). How are offenders, the level and type of the criminal activities they engage in, and their modus operandi affected?…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The money that is taken away from offenders should at least have some impact on them. Further research should focus on the effects of different sanctions and measures (see also Collins and King, 2013; House of Commons, 2014: 11; Sproat, 2007: 183–4). How are offenders, the level and type of the criminal activities they engage in, and their modus operandi affected?…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary for other countries especially developing countries to conduct FATF recommendations in their AML/ CTF frameworks. Sproat (2007) highlights the massive investments made in AML regimes as another challenge facing governments. He declares that the AML regimes not only cannot achieve their objectives but also impose some costs on the financial sectors without these investments.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the size of the banking sector, money laundering regulation has affected British banks and financial institutions in many respects (Sproat 2007;Levi 2010;Bergström et al 2011). Other than in the case of human trafficking or conflict diamonds, there had been no non-state advocacy related to money laundering.…”
Section: Public-private Interaction In the United Kingdommentioning
confidence: 99%