2007
DOI: 10.1159/000111796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Thyrotrophin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation Test in Paediatric Clinical Practice

Abstract: Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) test in children with suspected hypothalamic or pituitary dysfunction. Methods: We reviewed the case notes of all patients in whom a TRH test had been performed over a 6-year period. Group 1 (n = 85, 34 males, aged 0.9–18.8 years) was the reference group with no evidence of hypothalamic, pituitary or thyroid dysfunction. Group 2 (n = 42, 24 males, 0.1–18.0 years) were being investigated f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar range was observed in previous reports on congenital central hypothyroidism 2,3 , and is lower than observed in age-matched controls (14-37 mU/L) 3 . At later ages (7.3-63 years), TSH peaks were between 4.3-8.5 mU/L, which is in the lower half of the reported reference ranges for males (3.7-12.5 mU/L 4 or 4.1-13.9 mU/L 5 ). In eight patients, the increment of serum FT4 [mean (SD) 14.2 (7.9)%] was lower than that reported for controls [mean (SEM) 23.9 (2.7)%], but the FT3 response to TRH was normal (36.3% vs. 41.8% in controls 6, 7 (Supplementary Table 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A similar range was observed in previous reports on congenital central hypothyroidism 2,3 , and is lower than observed in age-matched controls (14-37 mU/L) 3 . At later ages (7.3-63 years), TSH peaks were between 4.3-8.5 mU/L, which is in the lower half of the reported reference ranges for males (3.7-12.5 mU/L 4 or 4.1-13.9 mU/L 5 ). In eight patients, the increment of serum FT4 [mean (SD) 14.2 (7.9)%] was lower than that reported for controls [mean (SEM) 23.9 (2.7)%], but the FT3 response to TRH was normal (36.3% vs. 41.8% in controls 6, 7 (Supplementary Table 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While normalization of TSH shows responsiveness of the hypothalamic pituitary axis to T4 and excludes the diagnosis of resistance to thyroid hormones, the lack of change of FT4 and the absent clinical impact suggest that the observed abnormalities of TSH may be related to a different underlying mechanism of TSH modulation. This mild abnormality does not per se explain the lack of catch-up underscoring the practice, suggesting that SGA patients with abnormal TSH response to TRH but normal FT4 do not require treatment with thyroxine [24]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%