2005
DOI: 10.1080/13632460509350538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Strong Ground Motion Recorded During the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Turkey, Earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for 1.00 sec), and thus it is periods of greatest correlation between components that control the value of h min . The strong linear polarization tends to occur at moderate to long periods, although the periods at which it occurs can be quite variable (being near 1 sec for the Pacoima Dam recording of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake but periods on the order of 10 sec for other earthquakes, such as the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake ( [Boore et al, 2002] and the 2003 Bingöl earthquake [Akkar et al, [2005]). …”
Section: Gmrotipp: Orientation-independent Geometric Mean Using Perimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 for 1.00 sec), and thus it is periods of greatest correlation between components that control the value of h min . The strong linear polarization tends to occur at moderate to long periods, although the periods at which it occurs can be quite variable (being near 1 sec for the Pacoima Dam recording of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake but periods on the order of 10 sec for other earthquakes, such as the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake ( [Boore et al, 2002] and the 2003 Bingöl earthquake [Akkar et al, [2005]). …”
Section: Gmrotipp: Orientation-independent Geometric Mean Using Perimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To implement the procedure we used the ground motions presented in Table 1. We chose these records for several reasons: the 1999 Chi-Chi records are large amplitude and are known to have linear trends in the ZOC velocity; the other records, from earthquakes in Turkey, are smaller in amplitude but also have linear trends in velocity (see Akkar et al, 2005, for an in depth analysis of the Bingöl record). For each record we determined t BLb , t BLe , a f , and vt BLe .…”
Section: Baseline Corrections and Estimation Of Elastic Spectra And Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bingöl earthquake struck with a magnitude M w = 6.4, reported peak ground acceleration (PGA) 0.556 g and PGV 34.5 cm/s [50]. Moreover, studies by Akkar et al [51] and Harirchian et al [12] provide detailed technical information about the characteristics of the Bingöl earthquake and the information about the observed buildings, respectively. A report from the observed damage to the buildings in different places in Bingöl stated that damages were mostly due to the properties of structures, and not due to the foundation conditions or any ground deformation [52].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%